Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Effective implementation of punishments: problems of criminal law theory and practice

Annotation

The effectiveness of the implementation of punishment, analyzing the problems of criminal law theory and practice is considered. It is stated that the national system of punishment is currently one of the most impressive in its scope and the most differentiated among national criminal laws. In turn, the author concludes that it is not enough optimal feasibility and essentially ineffective. The correlation produced by the legislator in the first place, the expansion of the Federal Law of December 7, 2011 № 420-FZ due to forced labor under paragraph “z.1” Art. 44, Art. 531 of the Criminal Code are investigated. The presence in it of three types of punishments that are directly related to the real work of convicted persons is considered. As in the situation of systematic ongoing global economic crisis, unemployment and sanctions taken correlation rather illogical, a number of short stories of the Criminal Code (as forced labor, as well as earlier arrest) does not actually provide logistical and organizational. Accordingly, it is conclluded that it is these types may actually due to the current lack of specialized agencies - correctional centers and detention homes become already traditional for the domestic legislation so-called “deferred kinds of punishments”. In order to solve the existing problems in the implementation of punishments article proposes a set of legislative and enforcement measures to improve the efficiency of individual species.

Keywords

forms of punishment; fine; forced labor; correctional labor; effectiveness of implementation; other measures of criminal law; non-optimal form of criminal liability; Criminal Code of Russian Federation; optimality of national system of penalties

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

343.1

Pages

134-147

References

1. Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz. M., 2009. 2. Lakeev A.A. Vidy ugolovnykh sanktsiy po zakonodatel'stvu zarubezhnykh stran i ikh primenenie. Ryazan', 1994. 3. Kurts A.V. Shtraf kak vid ugolovnogo nakazaniya po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: avtoref. dis. … kand. yur. nauk. Yoshkar-Ola, 2001. 4. Kuchval'skaya I.V. Shtraf v sisteme mer vozdeystviya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. yur. nauk. Mn., 1996. 5. Sakaev A.I. Sistema nakazaniy po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii (Istoriya i sovremennost'): dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Kazan', 1999. 6. Dvoretskiy M.Yu., Stromov V.Yu. Sistema ugolovnykh nakazaniy: istoriya razvitiya, sushchnost', tseli, primenenie i effektivnost': monografiya. Tambov, 2007. 7. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Napravleniya sovershenst-vovaniya sistemy otdel'nykh vidov ugolovnykh nakazaniy i inykh mer ispravleniya i bezopas-nosti v kontekste optimizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti po UK FRG // “Chernye dyry” v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2009. № 5. S. 86-88. 8. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti kak optimal'noe sredstvo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy i prestupnosti: monografiya. Tambov, 2009. 9. Razumov S. Prestupleniya i nakazaniya. K voprosu o sorazmernosti ustanovlennykh UK RF mer otvetstvennosti // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 11. 10. Naumov A.V. “Kamni pretknoveniya” ugolovnogo nakazaniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 9. 11. Milyukov S.F. Rossiyskaya sistema nakazaniy. SPb., 1998. 12. Lempert I.N. Pravovaya kharakteristika shtrafa kak vida ugolovnogo nakazaniya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Krasnoyarsk, 2004. 13. Pogosyan T.Yu. Shtraf kak mera ugolovnogo nakazaniya. Sverdlovsk, 1989. 14. Smol'kova I.V. Naznachenie nakazaniya, ego effektivnost' i osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya. Irkutsk, 1978. 15. Duyunov V.K. Problemy ugolovnogo nakazaniya v teorii, zakonodatel'stve i sudebnoy praktike. Kursk, 2000. 16. Kurts A.V., Makov V.P. Naznachenie sudom nakazaniya v vide shtrafa // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2001. № 7. 17. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i protsessy globalizatsii // Sbornik materialov 5 Rossiyskogo Kongressa ugolovnogo prava / otv. red. V.S. Komissarov. M., 2010. 18. Dvoretskiy M.Yu., Stromov V.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Sbornik materialov 7 Rossiyskogo Kongressa ugolovnogo prava / otv. red. V.S. Komissarov. M., 2012 19. Dvoretskiy M.Yu., Stromov V.Yu., Kononykhin S.Yu., Kurmanova O.N. Problemy naznacheniya nakazaniya v kontekste optimizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: voprosy ugolovno-pravovoy teorii i effektivnoy pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki. Tambov, 2011. 20. Vittenberg G.B. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva o nakazanii // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1980. № 6. 21. Uporov I.V. Tselepolaganie otdel'nykh vidov nakazaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2001. № 3. 22. Duyunov V.K., Tsvetinovich A.L. Dopolnitel'nye nakazaniya: teoriya i praktika. Frunze, 1986. 23. Tyutyugin V.I. Lishenie prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu kak vid nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Khar'kov, 1975. 24. Kuznechenko N.V. Lishenie prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu kak vid nakazaniya. M., 1991. 25. Tsvetinovich A.L. Dopolnitel'nye nakazaniya: funktsii, sistema, vidy. Kuybyshev, 1989. 26. Litvina E.S. Nakazanie v vide lisheniya prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Tomsk, 2003. 27. Petrukhin I. Novyy Ugolovnyy kodeks: problema nakazaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 1999. № 3. 28. Dzigar' A.L. Ugolovnye nakazaniya: evolyutsiya i perspektivy: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2001. 29. Khutorskaya N.B. Opyt primeneniya obshchestvennykh (obyazatel'nykh) rabot za rubezhom // Al'ternativy tyuremnomu zaklyu-cheniyu v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: materialy Mezhdu-narodnoy konferentsii. M., 2001. 30. Budatarov S.N. Perspektivy ugolovnogo nakazaniya v vide obyazatel'nykh rabot // Razvitie al'ternativnykh sanktsiy v rossiyskoy ugolovnoy yustitsii: opyt i perspektivy. M., 2002. 31. Osadchaya N.G. Obyazatel'nye raboty kak novyy vid nakazaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Rostov n/D, 1999. 32. Chernov A.D. Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya vidov nakazaniya, ne svyazannykh s lisheniem svobody na sovremennom etape // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 1999. № 3. 33. Taralenko K.N. O soderzhanii nakazaniya v vide obyazatel'nykh rabot // Razvitie al'ternativnykh sanktsiy v rossiyskoy ugolovnoy yustitsii: opyt i perspektivy: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. M., 2002. 34. Chubrakov S.V. Ugolovnoe nakazanie v vide obyazatel'nykh rabot (perspektivnye voprosy teorii i praktiki): avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Tomsk, 2004. 35. Mikhlin A.S., Kazakova V.N. Ispravitel'nye raboty: perspektivy razvitiya // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1993. № 14. 36. Kydyyakov I.G. Primenenie ugolovnogo nakazaniya v vide ispravitel'nykh rabot: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Krasnoyarsk, 2002. 37. Naumov A.V. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Kurs lektsiy. M., 1996. 38. Utkin V.A. Po voennoy sluzhbe ogranichen // Zakonnost'. 1997. № 8.

Received

2014-06-11

Section of issue

Civil society and state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.