Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Tо a question of ways of judicial protection of legitimate interests

Annotation

Current state of Russian Federation requires native jurisprudence to pay special attention to the problems of enforcement and protection of rights, freedoms and legitimate individual interests, legal instruments improvement for the lawmaking, executive and protection and other significant law activities. At the same time one of the circumstances that impede the effective interests’ protection, is the commitment of the national law to the normative understanding. This approach causes the difficulties in cases where the protected person interests do not contradict the law and do not arise from the content of legal norms. The absence of any provisions of interest protected by the individual and reflected in actual law is considered by court as the protection ineligibility in material and procedural sense. In some cases, the intention to formal keeping legal norms prevails over life, economic and social realities, ignores facts of case and denies judicial protection of legitimate individual interests. The problem of protection of subjective rights and legitimate interests, which have no reflection and consolidation in the objective law is considered, and actual ways them to resolve is offered.

Keywords

subjective rights and legitimate interests; ways of the legitimate interests protection; interest not reflected in the objective law

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

340

Pages

116-121

References

1. Vasil'eva M.I. O sootnoshenii interesa i sub"ektivnogo prava v ekologicheskikh pravootnosheniyakh // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2012. № 4. 2. Solovykh S.Zh. Rol' sub"ektivnykh protsessual'nykh prav v mekhanizme realizatsii prava na sudebnuyu zashchitu // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2013. № 4. 3. Sitdikova R.I. Obespechenie chastnykh, obshchestvennykh i publichnykh interesov avtorskim pravom // Statut. 2013. 4. Melekhin A.V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 2009. 5. Paraskevov N.N. Zakonnye interesy – ob"ekt ugolovno-pravovoy zashchity // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2009. № 7. 6. Mal'ko A.V., Subochev V.V., Sheriev A.M. Pra-va, svobody i zakonnye interesy: problemy yuridicheskogo obespecheniya. M., 2010. 7. Shapkina G.S. Primenenie aktsionernogo zakonodatel'stva. M., 2009. 8. Opredelenie Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF ot 24.07.2012 g. № VAS-9199/12 po delu № A32-4064/2011 g. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 9. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF ot 22.11.2011 g. № 7677/11 po delu № A65-11798/2010-SG3-14. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 10. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 18.07.2006 g. № 367-O ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu “Skorpion” na narushenie konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod st. 12 i 13 GK RF. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 11. P. 2 Opredeleniya Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 15.04.2008 g. № 314-O-O ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Petrova V.E. na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniyami p. 1 ch. 1 st. 134 i ch. 3 st. 377 GPK RF. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 12. P. 2 Opredeleniya Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 04.06.2013 g. № 900-O ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanki Chirkovoy T.A. na narushenie ee konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniyami ch. 1 st. 30.1 KoAP RF. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 13. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 16 oktyabrya 2003 g. № 360-O ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Alekseeva Yu.V. na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav p. 5 ch. 1 st. 108 APK RF i podp. 2 p. 2 st. 6 Federal'nogo zakona “O gosudarstvennoy poshline”. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tant Plyus”. 14. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF ot 08.02.2011 g. № 13534/10 po delu № A45-25267/2009. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 15. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o zashchite chesti i dostoinstva grazhdan, a takzhe delovoy reputatsii grazhdan i yuridicheskikh lits: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 24.02.2005 g. № 3 Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 16. P. 3 Postanovleniya Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 14.07.2011 g. № 16-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy p. 4 ch. 1 st. 24 i p. 1 st. 254 UPK RF v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan S.I. Aleksandrina i Yu.F. Vashchenko. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 17. Informatsiya o Postanovlenii Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 07.10.2010 g. po delu “Konstantin Markin (Konstantin Markin) protiv Rossii”. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 18. Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 24.11.2005 g. po delu “Shofman (Shofman) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii”. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 19. Obzor zakonodatel'stva i sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo suda RF za 3 kvartal 2009 g. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus”.

Received

2014-06-09

Section of issue

Civil society and state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.