Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Features of legal regulation of arbitration courts in countries with Anglo-Saxon and Roman-Germanic legal systems: comparative legal analysis

Annotation

Comparative legal analysis of arbitration courts in foreign countries is given. The problem of determining the legal nature of the institution of arbitration courts in Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic legal systems is considered. The basic elements that define the specificity of models of legal regulation of arbitration courts in foreign countries, in particular, the sources of legal regulation of the arbitration courts, the arbitration agreement, the competence of arbitration courts, the nature of the arbitral award is considered. The basic criteria by which to determine the characteristics of legal models of arbitration courts in the Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic legal systems are formulated. It is cconcluded that at the present time in foreign countries two models of arbitration are formed, negotiated in the Anglo-Saxon legal system and procedural countries Romano-Germanic system. Negotiated arbitration model is characterized by the creation of a separate legal acts non-procedural legislation, high role of treaty law. Procedural model arbitration has the inclusion rules on arbitration courts in procedural law; equating legal force to the force of the Arbitration Court judgment.

Keywords

arbitration; legal regulation; competence model of arbitration; arbitration agreement; arbitration decision; legal system

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

347.918

Pages

197-201

References

1. Danilevich A.S. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh. Mn., 2005. 2. Baron P.M., Liniger S. A Second Look at Arbi-trability // Arbitration International. 2003. Vol. 19. № 1. 3. Nosyreva E.I. Al'ternativnoe razreshenie sporov v SShA. M., 2005. 4. Mikshis D.V. Treteyskiy sud kak forma za-shchity chastnykh prav i institut grazhdanskogo obshchestva: traditsii angliyskoy modeli // Grazhdanskoe zakonodatel'stvo. Stat'i. Kommentarii. Praktika. Alma-Aty, 2012. Vyp. 40. S. 273-292. 5. Kurochkin S.A. Treteyskoe razbiratel'stvo grazhdanskikh del v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teoriya i praktika. M., 2007. 6. Tarasov V.N. Arbitrazh vo Frantsii // Treteyskiy sud. 2000. № 2. URL: http://arbitrage. spb.ru/jts/2000/1/index.html (data obrashcheniya: 21.12.2013). 7. Treteyskoe razbiratel'stvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Kurochkin S.A. [i dr.]. M., 2010. 8. Yagudina E.A. Sravnenie kriteriev dopustimosti peredachi sporov na rassmotrenie mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh arbitrazhey v otechestvennom i zarubezhnom zakonodatel'stve i pravoprimenitel'noy praktike // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2007. № 10. S. 121-126. 9. Trunk A. Ob"ektivnaya arbitrabil'nost' sporov i isklyuchitel'naya kompetentsiya gosudarstvennykh sudov po germanskomu pravu // Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh. 2005. № 4. S. 127-130.

Received

2013-12-28

Section of issue

Law

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.