Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Directions of legislation perfection of realization of criminal responsibility: problems of home theory and legal applied practice

Annotation

The directions of optimization of responsibility for crimes at the present stage of crime struggle in Russian federation are considered. The object of research is the complex of theoretical and practical problems of criminal responsibility, its notion, base, system of forms, types, its realization and efficiency in home criminal-legal theory, legislative and legal applied practice. A historical and criminal-legal analysis of home criminal legislation including famous scientists of considered scientific practical task is given. The achievement of stated aim is supported by the decision of a row of research tasks. First of all, it is studying stage by stage history of appearing and development of criminal-legal category “criminal responsibility” in home general theory of law and branch legislation. Also it is analysis and comparison of the use by home legislator of criminal-legal category “criminal responsibility” in Criminal Code of Russian Federation with norms of modern criminal legislation of foreign states by certain way. In the end it is offered to legislator to develop the conceptual directions of perfection of state policy, norms CC of RF supplying the effective realization of criminal responsibility. There is a critical analysis of norms of present branch legislation, the offers of its optimization within rise of efficiency of forms and types of realization of criminal responsibility at the present stage of reformation of CC of RF are given.

Keywords

efficiency; optimization; types of punishment; other measures of criminal-legal character; criminal responsibility; Criminal Code of Russian Federation; effective realization of criminal responsibility

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

343.1

Pages

205-214

References

1. Kudryavtsev V.N., Lazarev B.M. Distsiplina i otvetstvennost': puti ukrepleniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1981. № 6. S. 74-75. 2. Sakharov A.E. Planirovanie ugolovnoy politiki i perspektivy razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Planirovanie bor'by s prestupnost'yu. M., 1982. S. 10-11. 3. Malein N.S. Neotvratimost' i individualizatsiya otvetstvennosti // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1982. № 11. 4. Astemirov Z.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' // Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. SPb., 2007. T. 8. S. 55-56. 5. Struchkov N.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' i ee realizatsiya v bor'be s prestupnost'yu. Saratov, 1977. 6. Struchkov N.A. O nakazanii, sisteme ego vidov i inykh merakh ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya // Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo prava. M., 1988. S. 91-102. 7. Santalov A.I. Teoreticheskie voprosy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. L., 1982. S. 58-59. 8. Retyunskikh I.S. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' i ee realizatsiya. Voronezh, 1983. 9. Dal' V.I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo veliko-russkogo yazyka: v 4 t. M., 2006. T. 4. 10. Slovar' inostrannykh slov. M., 1988. S. 429. 11. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka / pod red. S.I. Ozhegova, N.Yu. Shvedovoy M., 1999. 12. Zel'dov S.I. Ugolovno-pravovye mery voz-deystviya kak forma realizatsii printsipa neotvratimosti otvetstvennosti // KhKhVI s"ezd KPSS i ukreplenie zakonnosti i pravoporyadka. M., 1982. 13. Astemirov Z.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' // Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. SPb., 2007. T. 8. S. 55-56. 14. Kurlyandskiy M. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' i mery obshchestvennogo vozdeystviya. M., 1965. 15. Ogurtsov N.A. Yuridicheskie fakty i otvetstvennost' v sovetskom ugolovnom prave // Problemy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniy v svete resheniy KhKhVII s"ezda KPSS. Ryazan', 1987. S. 44-57. 16. Leykina N.S. Lichnost' prestupnika i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'. L., 1968. 17. Osipov P.P. Teoreticheskie osnovy postroeniya i primeneniya ugolovno-pravovykh sanktsiy. L., 1976. S. 53-54. 18. Shcherbakov V.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' i ee osnovanie: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Saratov, 1992. 19. Sakaev A.I. Sistema nakazaniy po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii (Istoriya i sovremennost'): avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Samara, 1999. 20. Piontkovskiy A.A. O ponyatii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1967. № 12. 21. Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz. M., 2009.

Received

2014-05-12

Section of issue

Civil society and state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.