Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Nature of personality and culture of construction of life scenario


The most complicated problem of the relationship of personality structure and cultural determinants of designing out its life scenarios are considered. Hypothesis put forward the structure and nature of personality, personality organization levels due to cultural framework life scenarios described in this hierarchy acting mental mechanisms of personality. According to the basic hypothesis of the basis for structuring the human “I-system” is existential, treated as fixed in the oldest clusters psyche fundamental fear of reason before its uniqueness, not reducible to any form of external world. Personal complexes, phobias and its mania back to the existential. “Axial principle” of individual behaviors are attempts to block or mitigate such “touching existential”, especially at described levels of “social” and “vital” “I”. Direct expression of such dependencies is to develop by personality own life scenarios. Several types of scenarios are highlighted: “subjective-idealist” (abstract desired developments), “subjectively negative” (most unwanted scenario), and “highest probability scenario (representations of the person most likely scenario for him) Accounting for the most common life scenarios of population is a necessary condition for social management framework, which is aimed at promoting the social aspects of such scenarios.


personality; existential; culture; life-stage theory

Full-text in one file







1. Krechmer E. Stroenie tela i kharakter. M., 1924. 2. Kettell R., Ayzenk G., Ollport G. Psikhologiya individual'nosti. Faktornye teorii lichnosti. M., 2007. 3. Levin K. Dinamicheskaya psikhologiya. M., 2001. 4. Maslou A., Mey R., Ollport G., Rodzhers K. Ekzistentsial'naya psikhologiya. M., 1999. 5. Ollport G. Lichnost' v psikhologii. M., 1998. 6. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Teksty / pod red. Yu.B. Gippenreyter, A.A. Puzyreya. M., 1982. 7. Freyd Z. «Ya» i «Ono». M., 2007. 8. Hall C.S., Lindsey G. Theories of Personality. N. Y., 1970. 9. Levin K. Topologiya i teoriya polya. Istoriya psikhologii. Period otkrytogo krizisa (nachalo 10-kh – seredina 30-kh godov XX veka) / pod red. P.Ya. Gal'perina, A.N. Zhdana. M., 1992. 10. Zeygarnik V.V. Psikhologiya K. Levina. M., 1970. 11. Freyd Z. Ya i Ono. M., 2003. 12. Istoriya psikhologii. Period otkrytogo krizisa / pod red. P.Ya. Gal'perina i dr. M., 1992. 13. Chernoushek M. Psikhologiya zhiznennoy sredy. M., 1989. 14. Kak rabotayut yaponskie predpriyatiya / pod red. Ya. Mondeny, R. Sibakavy i dr. M., 1989. 15. Petrovskiy A.V. Lichnost'. Deyatel'nost'. Kollektiv. M., 1982. 16. Son-semioticheskoe okno. 26-e Vipperovskie chteniya. M., 1993. 17. Sagan K. Drakony Edema. M., 1986. 18. Bisvanger L. Bytie-v-mire. Vvedenie v ekzistentsial'nuyu psikhiatriyu: Izbrannye stat'i / per. s angl. E. Surpinoy. M., 1999. 19. Gor'kiy M. P'esy. M., 1980.



Section of issue

Questions of theory and methodology

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.