Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Theoretical-legal characteristics of arbitration courts competence

Annotation

The main structural elements of the competence of arbitration courts determine its specificity is considered. The purpose of the study is a comprehensive study of the essence of the competence of arbitration as the most important institution of arbitration proceedings in connection with which the work of the following tasks: the analysis and synthesis of available scientific approaches to the definition of competence; relationship with the concept of competence related concept of "jurisdiction"; identification and description of the main elements of the competence of arbitral tribunals, reflecting its specificity. The scientific novelty of the research lies in a comprehensive approach to the definition of the structural elements of the competence of arbitral tribunals. The basic structural elements of the competence of arbitration, namely, its base of occurrence, sources, and content on the basis of what is given by the author's definition of the concept of competence of arbitration courts are determined.

Keywords

competence; jurisdiction; powers; arbitration agreement; rights and duties

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

347.91

Pages

158-162

References

1. Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka / pod red. N.Yu. Shvedovoy. M., 1991. 2. Belousova E.V. O sootnoshenii kategoriy “kompetentsiya”, “polnomochiya” i “predmety vedeniya” v sisteme mestnogo samoupravleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2013. № 2. 3. Gadzhieva F.R. Kompetentsiya arbitrazhnykh sudov: problemy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Saratov, 2010. 4. Tikhomirova L.V., Tikhomirov M.Yu. Yuridi-cheskaya entsiklopediya / pod red. M.Yu. Tikho-mirova. M., 2006. 5. Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo / pod red. V.A. Vlasova, S.S. Studenikina. M., 1959. 6. Druzhkov P.S. Sudebnaya podvedomstvennost' sporov o prave i inykh pravovykh voprosov, rassmatrivaemykh v poryadke grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Sverdlovsk, 1966. 7. Lebedev M.Yu. Razvitie instituta yurisdiktsii i ego proyavlenie v treteyskom sude: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Saratov, 2005. 8. Popondopulo V.F., Slepchenko E.V. Podve-domstvennost' sporov treteyskim sudam v Rossii // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2008. № 1. 9. Kharitonova Yu.S. Upravlenie v grazhdanskom prave: problemy teorii i praktiki. M., 2011. 10. Osipov Yu.K. Podvedomstvennost' yuridi-cheskikh del. Sverdlovsk, 1973. 11. Muranov A.I. Nekotorye aspekty pravila perpetuation jurisdictionis primenitel'no k mezhdunarodnomu kommercheskomu arbitrazhu i gosudarstvennym arbitrazhnym sudam (primer iz praktiki Morskoy arbitrazhnoy komissii pri Torgovo-promyshlennoy palate Rossiyskoy Federatsii) // Treteyskiy sud. 2001. № 5-6. 12. Komarov V.V. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh. Khar'kov, 1995. 13. Kurochkin S.A. Treteyskoe razbiratel'stvo grazhdanskikh del v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teoriya i praktika. M., 2007. 14. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Teoriya kompetentsii. M., 2001.

Received

2013-12-03

Section of issue

Law

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.