Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

QUESTIONS OF IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE COURTS’ WORK

Annotation

A study of the current situation prevailing in the evaluation of the judicial system of the Russian Federation is presented. Analysis of the current situation in the field of evaluation criteria of its activity shows that in the federal courts of Russia, administering justice, applied system performance vessels developed during the Soviet period. The history of their occurrence is associated with the emergence of the Soviet Union in the late 1960s a special discipline of quality control, which, in particular, recognizes the possibility to express the quality of the object one quantitative indicator, despite the multiplicity of its parameters and characteristics. Therefore, the authors who developed the theory of the efficiency of justice at the time, in fact, carried out their qualitative assessment proceedings, thus bringing integrated indicators of efficiency of justice. Applied at the moment the system performance of the courts in Russia kept the former theoretical approaches to them and have the following significant drawbacks: almost no use qualitative indicators; characterized only by certain aspects of the activity of courts; based on the description of the motion of court cases; do not take into account the system of communication; It aims to provide superior control over the subordinate courts; poorly focused on the realization of the needs of the society, on the consumers of the judicial system. The study of foreign experience in this area shows that in the United States and leading European countries evaluation of judicial activity, includes a system of criteria to ensure the quality of the courts. The formation of modern systems of evaluation of the judicial system in our country to take into account not only quantitative but also qualitative criteria is proposed. At the same time a certain part of them should assess the performance of the judicial system from the outside, from the perspective of citizens - recipients of “services” of the system.

Keywords

judicial system of the Russian Federation; criteria for evaluation of the judicial system; both quantitative and qualitative criteria for assessing the performance of the judicial system

Full-text in one file

Download

DOI

10.20310/1810-0201-2015-20-10-173-179

UDC

343.1

Pages

173-179

References

1. Standarty spravedlivogo pravosudiya (mezhdunarodnye i natsional'nye praktiki) / pod red. T.G. Morshchakovoy. M., 2012. 2. Azgal'dov G.G., Raykhman E.P. O kvalimetrii. M., 1973. 3. Effektivnost' pravosudiya i problema ust-raneniya sudebnykh oshibok: monografiya: v 2 ch. / ruk. avt. kol. I.L. Petrukhin; otv. red. V.N. Kudryavtsev. M., 1975. Ch. 1. 4. Instruktsiya po vedeniyu sudebnoy statistiki. Prikaz Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom sude RF ot 29.12.2007 g. № 169. Dostup s informatsionno-pravovogo portala “Elektronnyy fond pravovoy i normativno-pravovoy dokumentatsii”. 5. Topil'skaya L.P. Kak nam obustroit' sudebnuyu vlast' // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2000. № 11. S. 50-60. 6. O sostoyanii sudebnoy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii i osnovnykh napravleniyakh ee razvitiya: postanovlenie 8 Vserossiyskogo s"ezda sudey ot 19.12.2012 g. // Vestnik Vysshey kvalifikatsionnoy kollegii sudey RF. M., 2013. № 1 (35). 7. Morshchakova T.G. Taynoe sudilishche ili otkrytoe pravosudie? Nezavisimyy tsentr izucheniya metodov bor'by s korruptsiey “Suda net”. URL: http://sudanet.ru/InterviewsTamaroi Morshaovoi (data obrashcheniya: 01.08.2015). 8. Nagornyy E.A. Krizis pravosoznaniya. Kriterii otsenki kachestva otechestvennogo sudoproiz-vodstva: nekotorye eticheskie aspekty // Novaya advokatskaya gazeta. 2011. 1–15 avgusta. 9. Kontseptsiya federal'noy tselevoy programmy “Razvitie sudebnoy sistemy Rossii na 2013–2020 gg.”: rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 20.09.2012 g. № 1735-r // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2012. № 40. St. 5474. 10. Otchet po Kriteriyam kachestva sudebnogo razbiratel'stva, podgotovlennyy v ramkakh Proekta kachestva v sudakh, nakhodyashchikhsya v yurisdiktsii Apellyatsionnogo suda Rovaniemi // Proekt sudov okruga Apellyatsionnogo suda Rovaniemi, Finlyandiya. Otsenka kachestva razresheniya del v sudakh. Printsipy i predlagaemye kriterii kachestva. 2006. Mart / per. A.G. Kotel'nikova, M.Yu. Kotel'nikovoy. Rovaniemi; Ekaterinburg; Oulu, 2007. 11. Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod (prinyata v g. Rime 04.11.1950) (s izm. ot 13.05.2004 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2001. № 2. St. 163. 12. Kontseptsiya federal'noy tselevoy programmy «Razvitie sudebnoy sistemy Rossii na 2013–2020 gody»: rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 20.09.2012 g. № 1735-r // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2012. № 40. St. 5474. 13. Interv'yu s sud'ey Konstitutsionnogo suda RF v otstavke T.G. Morshchakovoy // Yurist. M., 2012. № 6. S. 4-10.

Received

2015-08-11

Section of issue

Civil society and state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.