Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

On the issue of law principles perception in different concepts of legal understanding

Annotation

The present research is devoted to the study of law principles perception in different legal understanding concepts. The purpose of work is to analyze the concept and place of law principles in the legal system within the framework of various types of legal understanding, and the tasks of work are the law principles perception in the natural law concept by R. Dworkin, the libertarian theory of law by V.S. Nersesyants, positivist and integrative legal understanding. It is substantiated that the law principles concept, the allocation of their types and the definition of their role in the legal system is largely due to the type of legal understanding, which the scientist is a supporter of. Emphasis is placed on the axiological component of the studied approaches in relation to the law principles. It is proved that the natural-legal, liberal, positivist and integrative types of legal understanding allow focusing on the aspects of legal reality associated with various kinds of ideas in the field of law. It is concluded that in terms of law enforcement, the positivist approach is of the greatest importance, since it allows the subjects of law not only to understand the main ideas embodied in the legislation, but also orients them towards the practical implementation of normatively defined law principles. Natural-legal, liberal and, to some extent, integrative approaches have theoretical and methodological value – they do not directly matter for the regulation of social relations, but form the legislator's idea of the value of certain ideas, the possibility of their consolidation in the texts of normative legal acts and hence their further practical implementation.

Keywords

legal understanding concepts, law principles, natural law theories by R. Dworkin, libertarian theory of law, positivist legal understanding, integrative legal understanding

Full-text in one file

Download

DOI

10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-1-7-16

UDC

340.12

Pages

7-16

References

1. Dworkin R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 470 p. Available at: https://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/~cruzparc/empire.pdf 2. Dworkin R. (1967). The model of rules. University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 35, pp. 14-46. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol35/iss1/3/ 3. Dvorkin R. (2004). Taking Rights Seriously. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 389 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://studfile.net/preview/1765930/ 4. Lapaeva V.V. (2013). R. Dworkin’s concept of law in the context of libertarian theory of law. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 4, pp. 142-169. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sambud 5. Vetyutnev Yu.Yu. (2005). O pravoponimanii Ronal’da Dvorkina [On the legal understanding of Ronald Dworkin]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, no. 10, pp. 93-102. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/opcusf 6. Kasatkin S.N. (2018). Doctrine of legal principles and critique of positivism in works of “Early” R. Dworkin. Vestnik Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of Samara Academy for the Humanities. Series: Law, no. 1 (20), pp. 3-22. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ywmazf 7. Lapaeva V.V. (2012). Tipy pravoponimaniya: pravovaya teoriya i praktika [Types of Law Understanding: Legal Theory and Practice]. Moscow, Russian Academy of Justice Publ., 580 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://philosophicalclub.ru/content/docs/Lapaeva.pdf 8. Nersesyan V.S. (2009). Pravo i pravovoi zakon: stanovlenie i razvitie [Law and Legal Law: Formation and Development]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 384 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01004321350 9. Nersesyan V.S. (2020). Sovremennoe pravo: teoriya i metodologiya [Modern Law: Theory and Methodology]. Moscow, Norma; INFRA-M Publ., 304 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01005472728 10. Chetvernin V.A. (2007). Sovremennaya libertarno-yuridicheskaya teoriya [Modern libertarian legal theory]. Ezhegodnik libertarno-yuridicheskoi teorii [Yearbook of Libertarian Legal Theory]. Moscow, SU HSE Publishing House, no. 1, pp. 5-9. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2010/02/20/1232122347/ 300%2025.02.pdf 11. Varlamova N.V. (2010). Tipologiya pravoponimaniya i sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya teorii prava [Typology of Legal Understanding and Modern Trends in the Development of the Theory of Law]. St. Petersburg, National Research University Higher School of Economics Publ., 143 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.igpran.ru/aspirantura/obuchenie/literatura/problemy-tgp/Варламова-Типология%20правопо-нимания.pdf 12. Nersesyants V.S. (1983). Pravo i zakon: Iz istorii pravovykh uchenii [Law and Legislation: From the History of Legal Doctrines]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 366 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001140427 13. Ilyukhina V.A. (2022). Principles of law in the libertarian legal theory of V.S. Nersesyants. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo instituta upravleniya = Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management, no. 1 (63), pp. 58-64. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xhntub 14. Nersesyants V.S. (1996). Pravo – matematika svobody. Opyt proshlogo i perspektivy [Law is the Mathematics of Freedom. Past Experiences and Perspectives]. Moscow, Yurist’, 160 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://psihdocs.ru/nersesyanc-v-s-pravo-matematika-svobodi-opit-proshlogo-i-persp.html 15. Nersesyants V.S. (2004). Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of Law]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 656 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://artsakhlib.am/wp-content/plugins/download-attachments/includes/download.php?id=31435 16. Hart H.L.A. (1961). The Concept of Law. New York, Oxford University Press, 258 p. Available at: http://fs2.american.edu/dfagel/www/Class20Readings/Hart/Concept20of20LAW_Chapters201_2.pdf 17. Raz J. (1972). Legal principles and the limits of law. The Yale Law Journal, no. 81, pp. 823-854. Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1531&context=faculty_scholarship 18. Aleksandrov N.G. (1957). Sotsialisticheskie printsipy sovetskogo prava [Socialist principles of Soviet law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet State and Law], no 6, pp. 16-29. (In Russ.) Available at: http://lawlibrary.ru/article1041261.html 19. Chechina N.A. (1960). Printsipy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava i ikh normativnoe zakreplenie [Principles of Soviet civil procedural law and their normative consolidation]. Pravovedenie [Law Science], no. 3, pp. 78-83. (In Russ.) Available at: https://poisk-ru.ru/s52814t18.html (accessed: 10.11.2022) 20. Lukasheva E.A. (1970). Printsipy sotsialisticheskogo prava [Principles of socialist law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet State and Law], no. 6, pp. 21-29. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wmzmdz 21. Demichev A.A. (2014). Positivist classification of principles of modern Russian law. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, no. 5, pp. 5-13. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sgnrrx 22. Davydova M.L. (2016). The principles of positive law in the theoretical and legal discourse. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya, sotsiologiya i sotsial’nye tekhnologii = Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Series 7: Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies, no. 3 (33), pp. 36-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu7.2016.3.5, https://elibrary.ru/wxqovd 23. Baranov A.V. (2016). Norms-principles in the mechanism of legal regulation. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Tomsk State University Journal of Law, no. 4 (22), pp. 5-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/22/1, https://elibrary.ru/xhnhln 24. Demichev A.A., Ilyukhina V.A. (2019). On the issue of the place of consolidation of the principles of law in normative legal acts (a comparative analysis of the Russian and Armenian experience). Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii = Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, no. 2, pp. 23-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2078-5356-2019-10203, https://elibrary.ru/muxfar 25. Ilyukhina V.A. (2021). A Universal model of consolidating the principles of law in codified normative legal acts (general theoretical study). Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii = Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, no. 2, pp. 31-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36511/2078-5356-2021-2-31-35, https://elibrary.ru/xhytbg 26. Voronov A.F. (2009). Printsipy grazhdanskogo protsessa: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [Principles of Civil Process: Past, Present, Future]. Moscow, Publishing House “Gorodets”, 496 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://perviydoc.ru/v43391/voronov_a.f._printsipy_grazhdanskogo_protsessa_proshloe,_nastoyashchee,_budushchee 27. Cankorel T. (2008). Cognitive classification of legal principles: a new approach to international legal training. Ankara Law Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 153-200. Available at: https://dergiler.an-kara.edu.tr/xmlui;/bitstream/handle/20.500.12575/42807/16909.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 28. Daci J. (2010). Legal principles, legal values and legal norms: are they the same or different? Academicus International Scientific Journal, no. 2, pp. 109-115. Available at: https://www.academicus.edu.al/nr2/Academicus-MMX-2-109-115.pdf 29. Ershov V.V. (2018). Pravovoe i individual'noe regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnoshenii [Legal and Individual Regulation of Public Relations]. Moscow, Russian State University of Justice Publ., 628 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://op.raj.ru/index.php/serijnye-izdaniya/103-monografii/642-ershov-v-v-pravovoe-i-individualnoe-regulirovanie-obshchestvennykh-otnoshenij 30. Ershov V.V. (2018). The essence of the principles of law. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, no. 11 (12), pp. 2089-2103. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0375, https://elibrary.ru/yrqkot 31. Skorobogatov A.V., Krasnov A.V. (2020). Philosophical and legal nature of the law principle: methodological problems of research. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki = RUDN Journal of Law, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 547-571. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-3-547-571, https://elibrary.ru/smsyof 32. Amosov S.M., Nekrasov S.Yu. (2020). Modern types of legal understanding and legal realization of the principles of civil procedure law. Akademicheskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Academic Law Journal, no. 4 (82), pp. 48-52. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pxefsq

Received

2022-12-08

Section of issue

General theory and history of law and the state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.