Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

SOME PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE OF APPLICATION OF NORMS ON CONSEQUENCES OF THE TRANSACTION MADE ON PURPOSE OBVIOUSLY OPPOSITE TO BASES OF A LAW AND ORDER OR MORAL

Annotation

An analysis of the effects of transactions made for the purpose, knowingly contrary to the principles of public order or morality is given. An estimate of the concepts of “fundamentals of law” and “morality”, which causes difficulty in law enforcement, including possible violations of uniformity of judicial practice is made. A study case of such a transaction is given, the status of its legal assessment and review of law enforcement agencies, the consequences of this deal are negative consequences that are applied depending on the presence of intent to one or both sides of antisocial transaction, be reduced to the seizure of all received from the transaction to the revenue of the Russian Federation. While in the state income is withdrawn all amounts due under the transaction and are not only actually received. Confiscatory sanctions as consequences of anti-social transactions, by their nature, are of a public law nature. In this regard, it is emphasized that the state, through its organs, requiring the transaction to be anti-social and therefore null and void, together with the effects of such transaction, does not come with the parties to the transaction in relationships based on equality, autonomy of will and property independence. The conclusion is made about the existing problems in the application of norms about the consequences of a transaction made for the purpose, knowingly contrary to the principles of public order or morality and the absence of a common approach to solve practical problems, including the determination of the legal nature of invalid transactions.

Keywords

antisocial deal; deal against the principles of public order or morality; voidable deal; confiscatory penalties.

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

34.037

Pages

140-144

References

1. Blinova M.A. Nedeystvitel'nost' sdelki, sovershennoy s tsel'yu protivnoy osnovam pravoporyadka i nravstvennosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2003. 2. O narkoticheskikh sredstvakh i psikhotropnykh veshchestvakh (red. ot 25.11.2013 g., s izm. ot 04.06.2014 g.): federal'nyy zakon ot 08.01.1998 g. № 3-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1998. № 2. St. 219. 3. O merakh kontrolya v otnoshenii preparatov, kotorye soderzhat malye kolichestva narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov, vklyuchennykh v perechen' narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov, podlezhashchikh kontrolyu v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (red. ot 08.10.2014 g.): postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 20.07.2011 g. № 599 // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2011. № 30 (2). St. 4648. 4. Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka otpuska fizicheskim litsam lekarstvennykh preparatov dlya meditsinskogo primeneniya, soderzhashchikh krome malykh kolichestv narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov drugie farmakologicheskie aktivnye veshchestva (red. ot 21.08.2014 g.): prikaz Minzdravsotsrazvitiya Rossii ot 17.05.2012 g. № 562n. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus” (data obrashcheniya: 20.04.2015). 5. Danelyan R.N. Pravovye aspekty zashchity prav grazhdan i yuridicheskikh lits organami vnutrennikh del pri nedeystvitel'nykh sdelkakh // Akademicheskiy vestnik. 2009. № 2. S. 37-41. 6. O nekotorykh voprosakh praktiki rassmotreniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem stat'i 169 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 10.04.2008 g. № 22. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy “Konsul'tantPlyus” (data obrashcheniya: 20.04.2015).

Received

2015-04-28

Section of issue

Civil society and state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.