Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

TO THE SUBJECT OF LEGAL NATURE AND ESSENCE OF IDENTITY RIGHT OF A PERSON

Annotation

Juridical and ontological nature of human’s rights play an important role in theoretical perception and practical realization. In situation with personal (somatic) rights which present new formations in the list of other rights, it is important to understand juridical essence, problems of defining and also the content of this term. Actualized personal rights at the moment do not have fastening of possibilities of their use security and also the questions of responsibility in this sphere. State does not express its clear position in relation to personality rights direction of its somatic substance. The understanding of modern group of human rights to new generation in such system - personal or somatic is proposed. The opinion about implementing the term “personal rights” as their adequate juridical essence is agued. The opinions on this question are proposed. The nature of personal rights is defined through subjective rights according to the legal character of these events as of subjective rights they are not responsible for. These rights are presented as an aggregate of the warrant.

Keywords

personal, somatic human rights; juridical nature of rights; defining; subjective rights; legal interests

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

34.047

Pages

71-77

References

1. Golybina M.N. Prioritetnye napravleniya penitentsiarnoy politiki v kontseptsii razvitiya gosudarstva // Politicheskoe upravlenie: nauchnyy informatsionno-obrazovatel'nyy elektronnyy zhurnal. 2013. № 2 (05). 2. Kruss V.I. Lichnostnye («somaticheskie») prava cheloveka v konstitutsionnom i filosofsko-pravovom izmerenii: k postanovke problemy // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. № 10. 3. Kovler A.I. Antropologiya prava. M., 2002. 4. Prava cheloveka / pod red. E.A. Lukashevoy. M., 2003. 5. Starovoytova O.E. Telo i zakon. SPb., 2006. 6. Miloslavskaya D.I. Yuridicheskie terminy i ikh interpretatsiya // Rostovskaya elektronnaya gazeta. 1999. № 21. URL: www.regla.rsu.ru/ n27/rus271.htm (data obrashcheniya: 25.03.2015). 7. Efremova T.F. Sovremennyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. M., 2010. 8. Ushakov D.N. Bol'shoy tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. M., 2004. 9. Marksistko-leninskaya obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Osnovnye instituty i ponyatiya / predsed. red. soveta V.M. Chkhikvadze. M., 1970. 10. Lavrik M.A. K teorii somaticheskikh prav // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2005. № 3. (Yuridicheskaya Rossiya. Federal'nyy pravovoy portal. URL: http://law.edu.ru/doc/document. asp?docID=1229707) (data obrashcheniya: 15.03.2015). 11. Matuzov N.I. Lichnost'. Prava. Demokratiya: Teoreticheskie problemy sub"ektivnogo prava. Saratov, 1972. 12. Shepelev D.V. Problemy realizatsii i zashchity interesov v prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. 13. Dvoretskiy M.Yu., Stromov V.Yu. Sistema ugolovnykh nakazaniy: istoriya razvitiya, sushchnost', tseli, primenenie i effektivnost'. Tambov, 2007. 14. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti kak optimal'noe sredstvo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy i prestupnosti. Tambov, 2009. 15. Dvoretskiy M.Yu., Stromov V.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost': realizatsiya i effektivnost': monografiya: v 4 ch. Ch. 1. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' kak raznovidnost' sotsial'noy otvetstvennosti. Tambov, 2013. 16. Dvoretskiy M.Yu., Stromov V.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost': realizatsiya i effektivnost': monografiya: v 4 ch. Ch. 2. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost': istoriya zakonodatel'nogo zakrepleniya, ponyatie, sushchnost', vidy, osnovanie, realizatsiya v mekhanizme otechestvennogo ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya i ee effektivnost'. Tambov, 2013. 17. Dvoretskiy M.Yu., Stromov V.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost': realizatsiya i effektivnost': monografiya: v 4 ch. Ch. 3. Pravovoe regulirovanie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v zakonodatel'stve zarubezhnykh gosudarstv i v mezhdunarodno-pravovykh aktakh i perspektivy dal'neyshego zakonodatel'nogo sovershenstvovaniya. Tambov, 2013. 18. Antokol'skaya M.V. Semeynoe pravo. M., 1996. 19. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'. Zakonnost' // Zhurnal General'noy prokuratury RF. 2006. № 12. S. 11-12. 20. Dvoretskiy M.Yu., Razgil'diev B.T. Problemnye aspekty ponyatiya “yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'” i znachenie ikh resheniya dlya vyrabotki opredeleniya “ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'” // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2007. № 2. S. 14-17. 21. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Zakonodatel'noe opredelenie osnovaniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti kak pokazatel' urovnya razvitiya sovremennoy ugolovno-pravovoy nauki, ee modernizatsii // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii prava. 2007. № 1 (53). 22. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. K voprosu o vidakh ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. № 2. S. 40-44. 23. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Aktual'nye voprosy ponyatiya “yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'”, ego znachenie dlya teorii ugolovnogo prava // Advokatskaya praktika. 2007. № 4. S. 27-31. 24. Mal'ko A.V., Subochev V.V. Prava, svobody i zakonnye interesy: problemy yuridicheskogo obespecheniya. M., 2010. 25. Akimova T.V. Pravosoznanie gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: traditsii i novatsii // Sotsial'no-ekono-micheskie yavleniya i protsessy. Tambov, 2013. № 4 (50).

Received

2015-04-23

Section of issue

Civil society and state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.