Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

THE LIMITS OF HUMANIZATION OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW: FAIR FACES

Annotation

The cases of changes in the criminal procedure legislation, aimed at so-called “liberalization and humanization” are analyzed. The processes of forming a strong procedural figure of charge, observed over the last decade, giving him considerable powers are accompanied by visible for the unaided eye bias towards increasing the powers of persons prosecuted for crimes in the sphere of business. We can say that we are witnessing the formation of a certain degree of social class procedural form. As far as this is justified by the idea of how its implementation will ensure the preservation of the traditional pillars of the domestic criminal proceedings and many other related problems are discussed. Some ways to limit the spread of such initiatives in order to ensure citizens’ rights to access to justice in a fair basis are proposed. This right here is based not only on the equality of all before the law, but rather to ensure that all persons involved in the criminal process have equal opportunities, depending on the particular situation of forensic investigation in the case. It seems that the unity of the procedural form must be respected in all cases at any stage of judicial reform. The transformation of the domestic criminal justice system into the US analogue may be detrimental to the country’s future and its prospects in the international arena.

Keywords

humanization of the criminal procedure law; access to justice; justice

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

343.131.8

Pages

181-185

References

1. Strogovich M.S. Voprosy sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti i garantiy lichnosti v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse // Tezisy dokladov na nauchnoy sessii soveta shkoly po materialam XX s"ezda KPSS. M., 1956. S. 15-19. 2. Lukashevich V.Z. Garantii prav obvinyaemogo v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. L., 1955. 3. Rezepov V.P. Polnee obespechit' prava obvinyaemogo pri okonchanii rassledovaniya // Voprosy kodifikatsii sovetskogo prava. Vyp. 1. L., 1957. S. 112-116. 4. Chistyakov N. Pravo obvinyaemogo na zashchitu v stadii sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1958. № 5. S. 54-57. 5. Mizulina E.B. Ugolovnyy protsess: kontseptsiya samoogranicheniya gosudarstva: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. Yaroslavl', 1991. 6. Larin A.M., Larin A.M. Nash inkvizitsionnyy protsess // Sudebnaya vlast': nadezhdy i real'nost': sbornik nauchnykh statey. M., 1993. S. 60-77. 7. Mikhaylovskaya I.B. Tseli, funktsii i printsipy rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (ugolovno-protsessual'naya forma). M., 2003. 8. Solov'ev I.N. Gumanizatsiya zakonodatel'stva, predusmatrivayushchego otvetstvennost' za sovershenie ekonomicheskikh prestupleniy, kak «myagkaya» amnistiya v sfere ekonomiki // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2014. № 13. S. 35-41. 9. Zasedanie nablyudatel'nogo soveta Agentstva strategicheskikh initsiativ. URL: http:// kremlin.ru/events/president/news/19625 (data obrashcheniya: 20.07.2015). 10. Vstrecha s Predsedatelem Verkhovnogo suda Vyacheslavom Lebedevym. URL: http:// kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50076 (data obrashcheniya: 01.08.2015). 11. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2015. № 24. St. 3367. 12. Ofitsial'nyy sayt Verkhovnogo suda Gruzii. URL: http://www.supremecourt.ge/ (data obrashcheniya 20.06.2015).

Received

2015-08-10

Section of issue

Civil society and state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.