You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article
The use of principles of semiotics analysis to study the paintings in the university (basing on the example of E. Munch’s work)
The main principles of semiotics analysis of paintings and the use of them in educational process in High School are considered. The purpose is to show the possibility of this method for students by E. Munch’s work. We see the artist’s work from the standpoint of his life, perception of reality, and from facts which influence on his forming artistic imagery, and which will be in his further works realized. During the consideration of this methodology the main principles of semiotics approach were identified, that allows to create your own artistic image in the process of co-creative artistic perception and besides his philosophical and moral-aesthetic views. An important element of this approach is the fact that as a result it forms the specific competencies of the learner, indicated in the state educational standard. In addition, this technique allows to access the history of the art of the image created by the author in a historical context, as well as his pre-double in a modern viewer world. In the result, it was proven that the method of semiotic analysis allows the student to use data from different sources, which are necessary for a holistic perception of the artwork.
semiotic analysis; artistic image; E. Munch; painting study in the university
Full-text in one file
1. Gunina E.V., Semenov V.N. Teoriya i metodika obucheniya izobrazitel'nomu iskusstvu: istoriya i sovremennost' [Theory and Methods of Teaching About Visual Art: History and Modernity]. Vladimir, Publishing House of Vladimir State University, 2012, 98 p. (In Russian). 2. Akhmetova G.P., Fakhrutdinova R.A., Rybakova M.V. Razvitie professional'nykh kompetentsiy studentov (budushchikh dizaynerov) sredstvami khudozhestvenno-izobrazitel'noy deyatel'nosti v obrazovatel'nom prostranstve vuza (na primere distsipliny «Pedagogika i metodika prepodavaniya khudozhestvennykh i iskusstvovedcheskikh distsiplin») [Development of Professional Competence of Students (Future Designers) by means of Art Activity in Educatiopnal University Space (Based on Subject “Pedagogy and Methods of Teaching Art Subjects”)]. Kazan, Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasova Publ., 2016, 47 p. (In Russian). 3. Kharlamov I.F. Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 1999, 520 p. (In Russian). 4. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation no. 1412 of December 3, 2015, Federal'nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel'nyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya. Napravlenie podgotovki 51.03.01 Kul'turologiya [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education. Training Program 51.03.01 Culturo-logy]. Moscow, 2015. (In Russian). 5. Yakovleva N.A., Chagovets T.P., Mozgovaya E.B., Babiyak V.V., Mazhuga A.I. Analiz i interpretatsiya proizvedeniy iskusstva [Analysis and Interpretation of Art Work]. Moscow, Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 2005, 551 p. (In Russian). 6. Grinev-Ginevich S.V., Sorokina E.A. Osnovy semiotiki [Basic Principles of Semiotics]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2012, 256 p. (In Russian). 7. Stenersen R. Edvard Munk [Edvard Munch]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1972, 250 p. (In Russian). 8. Bishoff U. Munk [Munch]. Moscow, Art-Rodnik Publ., 2003, 96 p. (In Russian). 9. Velikie khudozhniki: ikh zhizn', vdokhnovenie i tvorchestvo [Great Painters: Their Life, Inspiration and Art]. Kiev, LLC “Iglmoss Yukreyn”, 2005, 32 p. (In Russian). 10. Nikolskaya T.M. Formirovanie navykov analiza proizvedeniy iskusstva posredstvom ikh vospriyatiya [Forming the skill of analyzing works of art through their perception]. Nauchnoe obozrenie – Science Education, 2009, no. 1, pp. 128-129. (In Russian).
Section of issue
Theory and methods of sociocultural activity organization
Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.