Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Realization of interrogative situation in dialogue

Annotation

The realization interrogative situations in dialogical space is considered, the role of that communication is described in the process of dialogization. Basic notions are analyzed such as interrogative sentence, address component, addresser, addressee, verbal and non-verbal means are analyzed. Urgency of the study is conditioned by increased interest to problem language and non-language to communications, to that structured unit, which form our speech, presenting its as dialogical unity. The main component of the dialogue is an interrogative sentence, emerging bright facility address component. The interrogative sentence can have different degree of the expression categories address component, but all of these carry underlined addressed nature, and this communication installation speaks of their destination for realization of importance address component. Addresser comes from presumption of intelligibility of the own utterance, from that that addressee possesses same arsenal of the speech units so its own speech it is compressed often. The Addressee of the verbal the lacking components of the sense, coming from own pre-supposition. Certain openness syntax components both question and answer parts is typical for interrogative situation. The special role is given to paralinguistic facility of the contact, complementing and compensating verbal of the facility. The dialogue as the form speech to the best advantage services the interpersonal nature of the contact, increases and circle communicating, and amount of the documentation centers.

Keywords

dialogue; interrogative situation; interrogative sentence; address component; addresser; addressee.

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

811.161.1

Pages

321-327

References

1. Issers O.S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi. M., 2011. 2. Chaplygina I.D. Sredstva adresovannosti: Ty-kategoriya v sovremennom russkom yazyke. M., 2001. 3. Il'enko S.G. Kommunikativnyy aspekt ras-smotreniya predlozheniya i vopros o ego priznannykh i nepriznannykh sostavlyayushchikh // Rusistika: Izbrannye trudy. SPb., 2003. 4. Budaragina E.I. Sredstva sozdaniya obraza adresata v khudozhestvennom tekste: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. M., 2006. 5. Vinokur T.G. Govoryashchiy i slushayushchiy. Varianty rechevogo povedeniya. M., 2009. 6. Vinogradov V.V. Nekotorye zadachi izucheniya sintaksisa prostogo predlozheniya (na materiale russkogo yazyka) // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1954. № 1. S. 3-29. 7. Shveytser A.D. Sovremennaya sotsiolingvistika: Teoriya, problemy, metody. M., 2012. 8. Gorelov I.N. Neverbal'nye komponenty kommunikatsii. M., 1980. 9. Kolshanskiy G.V. Sootnoshenie sub"ektivnykh i ob"ektivnykh faktorov v yazyke. M., 2005. 10. Kreydlin G.E. Neverbal'naya semiotika: Yazyk tela i estestvennyy yazyk. M., 2004.

Received

2014-10-02

Section of issue

Language. cognition. culture

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.