Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

The problem of diagnosing the results of educational design of communications of younger students

Annotation

We consider the concept of educational design as a tool that allows students to control communication. The second main task is the selection of a diagnostic tool that allows to evaluate the pedagogical efficiency of this control. We suggest that educational design should be based on reasonable technological solutions (i. e. on formalized, reproducible methods of activity), as well as allow the management of non-pedagogical (or partially pedagogical) objects and phenomena. One of these phenomena is the concept of communication. We present the substantiation of the criteria of the nature of teaching and the role of younger students in communication relations, which correspond to the peculiarities of educational design – first of all, adaptability and complexity. We describe the diagnostics of younger students’ communication complex and give information about its approbation. We present the analysis of the experimental data, including the analysis of the relationship of communicative skills components of younger students, which are specific for educational design.

Keywords

educational design; communication; communicative activity; communicative adequacy; younger students

Full-text in one file

Download

DOI

10.20310/1810-0201-2019-24-181-76-85

UDC

37.035.1

Pages

76-85

References

1. Shchedrovitskiy G.P., Genisaretskiy O.I. Metodologicheskaya kartina dizayna [Methodological picture of design]. Trudy VNIITE. Tekhnicheskaya estetika. Ch. 1. Teoreticheskiye i metodologicheskiye issledovaniya v dizayne: izbrannyye materialy [Proceedings of VNIITE. Technical Aesthetics. Part 1. Theoretical and Methodological Research on Design: Selected Materials]. Moscow, 1990, vol. 61, pp. 317-328. (In Russian). 2. Britain S. A Review of Learning Design. Concept, Specifications and Tools: a Report for the JISC E-Learning Pedagogy Programme. 2004. 27 p. Available at: https://staff.blog.ui.ac.id/harrybs/files/2008/ 10/learningdesigntoolsfinalreport.pdf (accessed 16.02.2019). 3. Lohr L., Ursyn A. Visualizing the instructional design process: seven usability strategies for promoting creative instruction. Design Principles and Practices: an International Journal, 2010, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 427-435. DOI 10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v04i02/37869 4. O’Reilly M. Educational design as transdisciplinary partnership: supporting assessment design for online. In: Atkinson R., McBeath C., Jonas-Dwyer D., Phillips R. (eds.). Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference “Beyond the Comfort Zone”. Perth, 2004, pp. 724-733. Available at: http://www.ascilite.org.au/con-fere-nces/perth04/procs/orielly.html (accessed 26.02.2019). 5. McKenney S., Mor Y. Supporting teachers in data-informed educational design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2015, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 265-279. DOI 10.1111/bjet.12262 6. Uvarov A.Y. Pedagogicheskiy dizayn [Educational design]. Informatika [Informatics], 2003, no. 30, pp. 2-31. (In Russian). 7. Abyzova E.V. Tekhnologiya formirovaniya informatsionno-konstruktivnoy kompetentnosti studentov – budushchikh pedagogov: na primere izucheniya osnov pedagogicheskogo dizayna: avtoref. dis. ... kand. ped. nauk [Technology of Formation of Information and Constructive Competence of Students – Future Teachers: On the Example of Basics of Educational design Study. Cand. ped. sci. diss. abstr.]. Izhevsk, 2012. (In Russian). 8. Gretsova E.P. Razvitiye poznavatel’nykh sposobnostey starsheklassnikov sredstvami pedagogicheskogo dizayna: avtoref. dis. ... kand. ped. nauk [Development of Cognitive Abilities of High School Students On Example of Educational design. Cand. ped. sci. diss. abstr.]. Saratov, 2016. (In Russian). 9. Jacobson R.O. Rechevaya kommunikatsiya. Yazyk v otnoshenii k drugim sistemam kommunikatsii [Speech communication. Language to other communication systems]. In: Jacobson R.O. Izbrannyye raboty [Selected Works]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985, pp. 306-330. (In Russian). 10. Lotman Y.M. Kul’tura kak kollektivnyy intellekt i problemy iskusstvennogo razuma [Culture as a Collective Intelligence and Problems of Artificial Intelligence]. Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 1977, 18 p. (In Russian). 11. Karakovskiy V.A., Novikova L.I., Selivanova N.L. Vospitaniye? Vospitaniye... Vospitaniye! Teoriya i praktika shkol’nykh vospitatel’nykh system [Education? Education... Education! Theory and Practice of School Educational Systems]. Moscow, 2000. (In Russian). 12. Bityanova M.R. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya: nauka, praktika i obraz mysley [Social Psychology: Science, Practice and Way of Thinking]. Moscow, EKSMO-Press Publ., 2001, 576 p. (In Russian). 13. Semago M.M., Semago N.Y. Organizatsiya i soderzhaniye deyatel’nosti psikhologa spetsial’nogo obrazovaniya [Organization and Content of the Activities of the Psychologist of Special Education]. Moscow, ARKTI Publ., 2005, 336 p. (In Russian).

Received

2019-03-27

Section of issue

Pedagogy of preschool and primary education

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.