Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Symbolic measures of political concepts of modern Russian parliamentary parties (on example of party programs)

Annotation

The symbolic dimension of political concepts Russian parliamentary parties from the standpoint of the methodology of socio-constructivist approach is considered. On an example of party programs parliamentary political parties by conducting discourse analysis of key concepts in order to reveal their ideological basis, the qualitative differences between the comparison and implement major symbolic positions of parties on various socio-political issues. The author reveals the specifics of the symbolic positioning of parties in the political space, identifies implementation mechanisms symbolic of politics as a way of constructing new social and political realities. Relevance of this study also lies in the fact that the concepts of “symbolic politics”, “symbolic authority”, “ideological and symbolic space” are insufficiently developed in the works of Russian political scientists and sociologists. Much of the research of political parties related to the analysis of their doctrines with economic and legal points of view, while the symbolic potential of politics stays out of the interest of scientists. Analyzing the symbolic concepts in party programs, the author focuses on the differences in ideological approaches, the content in lyrics diametrically opposed value-orientation models. Concludes that formulate general criteria in evaluating the content of political programs is unlikely as well as the lack of documents in the parliamentary political parties, a number of relevant concepts.

Keywords

symbolic dimension; concept; party program; discourse analysis

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

329.1/.6

Pages

87-92

References

1. Dyuverzhe M. Politicheskie partii. M., 2005. 2. Karasik V.I., Slyshkin G.G. Lingvokul'turologicheskiy kontsept kak edinitsa issledovaniya // Metodologicheskie problemy kognitivnoy lingvistiki: sbornik nauchnykh statey / pod red. I.A. Sternina. Voronezh, 2001. S. 75-80. 3. Losev A.F. Znak. Simvol. Mif. M., 1982. 4. KPRF. Programma partii // Programma partii KPRF. [2014]. URL: http://kprf.ru/party/ program/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.04.2014). 5. LDPR. Programma partii // Programma partii LDPR. [2014]. URL: http://ldpr.ru/party/ Program_LDPR/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.04.2014). 6. Spravedlivaya Rossiya. Programma partii. M., 2010. 7. Rolz Dzh. Teoriya spravedlivosti. Novosibirsk, 1995. 8. Edinaya Rossiya. Predvybornaya programma Vserossiyskoy politicheskoy partii “Edinaya Rossiya” na vyborakh prezidenta 4 marta 2012 goda // Programma partii Edinaya Ros-siya. [2014]. URL: http://putin2012.ru/program/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.04.2014). 9. Ideyno-simvolicheskoe prostranstvo postso-vetskoy Rossii: dinamika, institutsional'naya sreda, aktory: sbornik nauchnykh statey / pod red. O.Yu. Malinovoy. M., 2011. 10. Panov P.V. Instituty, identichnosti, prak-tiki: teoreticheskaya model' politicheskogo poryadka. M., 2011. 11. Simvolicheskaya politika: konstruirovanie predstavleniy o proshlom kak vlastnyy resurs: sbornik nauchnykh trudov / pod red. O.Yu. Ma-linovoy. M., 2012.

Received

2014-04-26

Section of issue

Modern russian policy

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.