Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Optimization of implementation of punishment types: problems of criminal law theory and practice

Annotation

The domestic system of punishment, which today is one of the most impressive in its scope and the most differentiated among national criminal laws, is considered. It is concluded that while the system is suboptimal realizable it is inherently inefficient. During the still ongoing global economic crisis and persistent unemployment in the country made by the legislator correlation are enough illogical. For example, a series of novels of the Criminal Code (as forced labor, as well as earlier arrest) is still, in fact, is not provided as the logistical, organizational and so directly, and can really due to the current lack of specialized agencies – correctional centers and detention homes become already traditional for the domestic legislation so-called “deferred kinds of punishments”. It is concluded that it violates the principle of equality and involves decreasing the educational potential of the species, declared and appointed as an alternative to imprisonment, thereby discrediting the domestic criminal law policy.

Keywords

system of criminal penalties; penalties; fine; forced labor; correctional labor; effectiveness of implementation; other measures of criminal law; non-optimality of forms of criminal liability; Criminal Code of Russian Federation; optimality of national system of punishment; effectiveness of criminal punishments

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

343.8

Pages

174-185

References

1. Mosienko V.P. Poryadok naznacheniya i ispolneniya nakazaniya v vide lisheniya spetsial'nogo, voinskogo ili pochetnogo zvaniya, klassnogo china i gosudarstvennykh nagrad i puti ego sovershenstvovaniya. Rostov n/D, 2000. 2. Sakaev A.I. Sistema nakazaniy po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii (Istoriya i sovremennost'): avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Kazan', 1999. 3. Konovalova S.I. Sistema nakazaniy v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Rostov n/D, 1999. 4. Mikhlin A.S. Ponyatie nakazaniya v vide lisheniya spetsial'nogo zvaniya, klassnogo china i gosudarstvennykh nagrad i ego ispolnenie // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2001. № 3. 5. Shuplenkov V.P. Lishenie voinskikh i drugikh zvaniy, a takzhe ordenov, medaley i pochetnykh zvaniy // Nakazaniya, ne svyazannye s lisheniem svobody. M., 1972. S. 86-87. 6. Ivanov V.Ya. Dolzhna li sokhranyat'sya konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak vid ugolovnogo naka-zaniya? // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1958. № 9. S. 100-101. 7. Golubov I.I. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak vid ugolovnogo nakazaniya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. M., 1999. 8. Kuznetsov A.P. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak kumulyativnyy vid nakazaniya v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 1999. № 2. 9. Chernov A.D. Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya vidov nakazaniya, ne svyazannykh s lisheniem svobody, na sovremennom etape // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 1999. № 3. 10. Milyukov S.F. Rossiyskaya sistema nakazaniy. SPb., 1998. 11. Dzigar' A.L. Ugolovnye nakazaniya: evolyutsiya i perspektivy: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2001. 12. Stepanishchev A.V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya primeneniya konfiskatsii imushchestva: avtoref. ... dis. kand. yur. nauk. M., 2000. 13. Marogulova I.L. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak mera nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. M., 1979. 14. Mikhlin A.S. Imushchestvennye nakazaniya – al'ternativa lisheniyu svobody za menee opasnye prestupleniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1981. № 6. S. 96-97. 15. Brilliantov A.P. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva o konfiskatsii imushchestva // Problemy primeneniya nakazaniy, ne svyazannykh s lisheniem svobody: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. M., 1988. 16. Zubkova V.I. Ugolovnoe nakazanie i ego sotsial'naya rol': teoriya i praktika. M., 2002. 17. Duyunov V.K. Problemy ugolovnogo nakazaniya v teorii, zakonodatel'stve i sudebnoy praktike. Kursk, 2000. 18. Pimonov V.A. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak ugolovnoe nakazanie // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 7. 19. Kristi N. Bor'ba s prestupnost'yu kak industriya. Vpered k Gulagu zapadnogo obraztsa? M., 1999. 20. Skoblikov P. A. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak nakazanie: dovody za i protiv // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. № 2. 21. Naumov A.V. “Kamni pretknoveniya” ugolovnogo nakazaniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 9.. 22. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Inye mery ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera v sisteme vidov ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: otsenka sostoyaniya i effektivnosti // Zakonodatel'stvo v bor'be s prestupnost'yu: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 27 marta 2009 g. / otv. red. O.S. Kapinus. M., 2010. S. 30-35. 23. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost': realizatsiya i effektivnost' // Materialy 7 Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 28–29 yanvarya 2010 g. / otv. red. A.I. Rarog. M., 2010. S. 16-19. 24. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i protsessy globa-lizatsii // Materialy 5 Rossiyskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava. 27–28 maya 2010 g. / otv. red. V.S. Komissarov. M., 2010. S. 651-655. 25. Tsvetinovich A.L. Dopolnitel'nye nakazaniya: funktsii, sistema, vidy. Kuybyshev, 1989. 26. Gadzhiev Kh. Imushchestvennye nakazaniya v sisteme mer ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1988. № 16. 27. Chuchaev A.I. Konfiskatsiya vozvrashchaetsya v Ugolovnyy kodeks, no v drugom kachestve // Zakonnost'. 2006. № 9. 28. Golik Yu.V. Konfiskatsiya vernulas'. Konfiskatsii ne budet // Lipetskaya gazeta. 2007. № 1. 29. Anoshchenkova S.V. Ugolovno-pravovoe uchenie o poterpevshem. M., 2006. 30. Krivenkov O., Suslin A. Nakazanie i vozmeshchenie vreda: problema prioriteta // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. № 4. S. 27-29. 31. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Predlozheniya po optimizatsii otdel'nykh vidov ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v kontekste povysheniya ikh effektivnosti // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. Tambov, 2010. Vyp. 11 (91). S. 280-282. 32. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Voronezhskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. Voronezh, 2011. № 1. S. 52-58. 33. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: problemy ugolovno-pravovoy teorii i pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki // Ugolovnaya politika i problemy pravoprimeneniya: sbornik statey po materialam mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 1 noyabrya 2013 g. / sost. E.N. Rakhmanova. SPb., 2013. S. 58-61.

Received

2014-06-04

Section of issue

Civil society and state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.