Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Pedagogical diagnostics of professional identity formation among cadets using expert assessment method

Annotation

We consider the current issue of pedagogical diagnostics of professional identity formation among cadets with expert assessment method for its implementation. The expert assessment method is one of the system elements of pedagogical diagnostics methods, we present the features, advantages and disadvantages of its use for assessing the professional identity formation among cadets, directions are proposed to increase the effectiveness of the expert assessment method and overcome its shortcomings in the process of diagnosing the formation of professional identity of cadets. The main requirements for experts – subjects of pedagogical diagnostics are to use methods within the framework of objective (documentary, experimental) and subjective (self-assessment of competence, mutual assessment by experts of other potential experts) approaches for the selection of experts. In addition to theoretical, the study has practical significance, which consists in the fact that its results can contribute to the effective use of the method of expert assessments not only to study the dynamics of the formation of professional identity of cadets in the educational process of military universities, but also to identify signs of such a dangerous psychological phenomenon as professional marginalization – the antipode of professional identity.

Keywords

professional identity; pedagogical diagnostics; expert assessment method

Full-text in one file

Download

DOI

10.20310/1810-231X-2021-20-4(50)-65-72

UDC

37.012.4

Pages

65-72

References

1. Sharshov I.A., Borzykh I.N. Kvalimetricheskiy instrumentariy i protsedura otsenivaniya professio-nal'nogo vospitaniya lichnosti v khode organizatsii studencheskogo samoupravleniya v vuze [Qualimetrical tools and procedure of estimation of professional education of the personality during the organization of student’s self-government at the higher education institution]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy zhurnal «Gaudeamus» – Psychological-Pedagogical Journal “Gaudeamus”, 2016, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 79-86. (In Russian). 2. Kuzmin R.I., Makarova L.N. Spetsifika korrelyatsionno-regressivnogo modelirovaniya v ramkakh psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniy [Specificity of correlation and regression modeling within psycho-logical and pedagogical researches]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki – Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences, 2012, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1059-1067. (In Russian). 3. Glukhanyuk N.S., Belova D.E. Psikhodiagnostika (praktikum) [Psychodiagnostics (praktikum)]. Moscow, Ekaterinburg, Delovaya kniga Publ., 2005, 270 p. (In Russian). 4. Shmeleva A.G., ed. Osnovy psikhodiagnostiki [Basic Psychodiagnostics]. Moscow, Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 1996, 544 p. (In Russian). 5. Miklyaeva A.V., Rumyantseva P.V. Diagnostika shkol'noy trevozhnosti [Diagnostics of School-Based Anxiety]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika – Psychological Diagnostics, 2006, no. 1, pp. 32-53. (In Russian). 6. Shikhov Yu.A., Shikhova O.F. Ekspertnye metody v pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh [Expert methods in pedagogical research]. Innovatsii v professional'nom i professional'no-pedagogicheskom obrazovanii [Innovations in Professional and Vocational Pedagogical Education]. Ekaterinburg, RSPPU Publ., 2015, pp. 164-166. (In Russian). 7. Dudina M.M., Khamatnurov F.T. Osnovy psikhologo-pedagogicheskoy diagnostiki [Basics of Psychological and Pedagogical Diagnostics]. Ekaterinburg, RSPPU Publ., 2016, 190 p. (In Russian). 8. Fetterman D.M. Empowerment Evaluation: Building Communities of Practice and a Culture of Learning. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2002, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 89-102.

Received

2021-10-06

Section of issue

Kindergarten, school, higher education institution

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.