Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Self-Organized Criticality in Criminal Activity: Cross-Country Analysis

Annotation

In article the author considered approaches of the theory of the self-organized criticality (SOC) to studying of social phenomena. The theory of SOC has heuristic potential for an explanation of some nonlinear effects – such as spontaneous flashes of social activity as a result of violation of harmony of causes and effects. The author presented signs of critical condition, in particular, pink noise. The main question of work – what are heuristic opportunities of the theory of the self-organized criticality for studying of criminal activity. The article stated the key ideas of this theory and presented methods of identification of pink noise as SOC attribute. The author investigated criminal activity more than in 20 countries of the world. Sources of basic data are: statistics of the UN, reports of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, previous researches. The author revealed that the numerical ranks showing change of criminal activity in some countries are pink noise. Pink noise indicates systems in a condition of the self-organized criticality (SOC). Such systems are capable to the spasmodic growth of activity without well observed proportional reasons. One of parameters of the studied numerical ranks – an indicator of the sedate law – can serve as the indicator for diagnostics of internal state of societies. Micro-level social problems generated macro-level instability. Pink noise and, then, avalanches arose under the influence of deep internal processes which, mostly, were hardly noticeable for external observers – politicians, intellectuals, officials. In the considered episodes the processes leading to social destabilization did not fade even during the periods of social and economic growth. The author offered typology of criminal activity on the basis of color / type of noise which is in the studied numerical ranks.

Keywords

Self-organized criticality, pink noise, crime

Full-text in one file

Download

DOI

10.20310/1819-8813-2018-13-104-34-40

UDC

303.7

Pages

34-40

References

1. Bak P. How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality. New York: Copernicus, 1996. 212 p. 2. Sneppen K., Bak P., Flyvbjerg H., Jensen M. H. Evolution as a self-organized critical phenomenon // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1995. Vol. 92. Issue 11. Р. 5209-5213. 3. Turcotte D. L. Self-organized criticality // Reports on Progress in Physics. 1999. Vol. 62. Issue 10. P. 1377. 4. Turcotte D. L., Rundle J. B. Self-organized complexity in the physical, biological, and social sciences // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002. Vol. 99. Issue 1. P. 2463-2465. 5. Buchanan M. Ubiquity. The Science of History… or Why the World is Simpler Than We Think. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2000. 288 p. 6. Brunk G. G. Self-Organized Criticality: A New Theory of Political Behaviour and Some of Its Implications // British Journal of Political Science. 2001. Vol. 31. Issue 2. Р. 427-445. 7. Brunk G. G. Why Are So Many Important Events Unpredictable? Self-Organized Criticality as the «Engine of History» // Japanese Journal of Political Science. 2002. Vol. 3. Issue 1. Р. 25-44. 8. Brunk G. G. Why Do Societies Collapse? A Theory Based on Self-Organized Criticality // Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2002. Vol. 14. Issue 2. Р. 195-230. 9. Borodkin L. I. Metodologiya analiza neustojchivykh sostoyanij v politiko-istoricheskikh protsessakh [Methodology of the analysis of unstable states in political and historical processes] // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2005. T. 3. № 7. S. 4-16. 10. Kron T., Grund T. Society as a Self-Organized Critical System // Cybernetics & Human Knowing. 2009. Vol. 16. Issue 1-2. Р. 65-82. 11. Malinetskij G. G. Chudo samoorganizovannoj kritichnosti [Miracle of the self-organized criticality] // Bak P. Kak rabotayet priroda: teoriya samoorganizovannoj kritichnosti. M.: URSS, 2013. C. 13-56. 12. Roberts D. C., Turcotte D. L. Fractality and Self-Organized Criticality of Wars // Fractals. 1998. Vol. 6. № 4. P. 351-358. 13. Cederman L.-E. Modeling the size of wars: from billiard balls to sandpiles // American Political Science Review. 2003. Issue 1. Р. 135-150. 14. Biggs M. Strikes as forest fires: Chicago and Paris in the late nineteenth century // American Journal of Sociology. 2005. Vol. 110. Р. 1684-1714. 15. Zhukov D. S., Kanishchev V. V., Lyamin S. K. Application of the theory of self-organized criticality to the investigation of historical processes // Sage Open. 2016. Vol. 6. Issue 4. URL: http://journals.sagepub.com-/doi/full/-10.1177/2158244016683216 16. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START). (2016). Global Terrorism Database [Data file]. Retrieved from https://ww-w.start.umd.edu/gtd 17. RAND Databse of Worldwide Terrorism Incidents. 2016. URL: http://smapp.rand.org/rwtid/search-_form.php

Section of issue

Problems of Modern Society

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.