Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Linguistic and culturological data of semiological analysis of existence modes within the framework of the union discourse

Annotation

Particular attention is paid to the consideration of semantic-semiotic components of the existence of culture, the meanings of cultural phenomena and analysis of the semantics of discursive components. Within the framework of a single discourse, ontological focuses are realized as part of the so-called “modes of being”: “being in oneself”, “being for oneself”, “being for another”, each of which does not exist in isolation; between them there is continuous interaction and mutual development in the implementation of cultural scenarios. Modes are embodied in the language, they are directly involved in the process of creating the so-called cultural and linguistic picture of the world. The ontological nature of modes is appeared not only in their existence, development, but also in their embodiment, representation, in the transfer of meanings, in the semantic aspect of discourse. The embodiment of the modes of being in culture from the standpoint of semantic analysis considered in two ways: linguistic and cultural. Cultural parameter and its representation in the system of ontological knowledge should be considered as the functioning of such a semantic-semiotic phenomenon, such a transformation as “components of culture”, which are described from the standpoint of the semiological analysis, suggesting that when considering the components of culture as a cultural (linguocultural) text is based on the semantic aspect of the process of deployment of ritual actions in all the variety of components of lexical codes.

Keywords

culture; being; modes of being; ontology; discourse; linguocultural text; semiological analysis

Full-text in one file

Download

DOI

10.20310/2587-6953-2018-4-15-25-32

UDC

82+81.42

Pages

25-32

References

1. Andreeva O.N. Reflektivnoe voploshchenie modusov bytiya v kul'ture s pozitsiy «semanticheskogo»: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty [The reflective realization of modes of existence in culture from the attitude of «semantic» part: theoretical and practical aspects]. Visnik Dnipropetrovs'kogo universitetu. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Visnik of Dnipropetrovsk University. Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science, 2013, vol. 21, no. 23 (2), pp. 18-23. (In Russian). 2. Marchenko A.Y., Shcheglova L.V. Modusy zabveniya v ontologii kul'tury [Mode of Obliviousness and Ontology of the Culture]. Saratov, Vuzovskoe obrazovanie Publ., 2017, 108 p. (In Russian). 3. Lotman Y.M. Semiotika kul'tury i ponyatie teksta [Culture Semiotics and Understanding of the Text]. Russkaya slovesnost'. Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta: Antologiya [Russian Language Arts. From the Theory of Language Arts to the Text Structure: Antology]. Moscow, 1997, pp. 202-205. (In Russian). 4. Lazareva L.N. Kalendarno-obryadoviy prazdnik v tekste sovremennoy kul'tury [Calendar and Ceremonial Event in the Modern Culture Text]. Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk State Institute of Culture Publ, 2017, 216 p. (In Russian). 5. Andreeva O.N. Semioticheskiy yazyk kul'tury i dukhovnaya kul'tura vostochnykh slavyan [Semiological culture analysis and spiritual culture of East Slavs]. In: Zheltova N.Y. (scientific ed.). Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Slavyanskiy mir: dukhovnye traditsii i slovesnost'» [Digest of Proceedings of International Scientific Conference “Slavonic World: Spiritual Traditions and Literature”]. Tambov, Print-Servis Publ., 2016, no. 7, pp. 232-235. (In Russian). 6. Andreeva O.N. Komponenty v strukture kul'turnogo teksta: problemy germenevticheskogo analiza [Components are in the structure of cultural text: problems of hermeneutics analysis]. Nauchniy al'manakh – Science Almanach, 2015, no. 6 (8), pp. 255-260. DOI: 10.17117/na.2015.06.255. (In Russian). 7. Vinogradova L.N., Tolstaya S.M. Ritual'noe priglashenie mifologicheskikh personazhey na rozhdestvenskiy uzhin: formula i obryad [Ritual invitation of mythological heroes to Christmas dinner: formula and ceremony]. Sbornik statey pamyati G.L. Permyakova «Malye formy fol'klora» [Digest of Articles Dedicated to Memory of G.L. Permyakov “Minor Forms of Folklore”]. Moscow, 1995, pp. 49-98. (In Russian). 8. Hengst K. Eigennamen und Textstruktur. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Onomastic Sciences. Aberdeen, 1996, pp. 32-43. (In German). 9. Mazhitov M.I. Kul'turnaya sreda kak faktor formirovaniya struktury poznaniya [Cultural Environment as a factor of knowledge structure formation]. Innovatsionnye napravleniya v nauke, tekhnike, obrazovanii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2 ch. [Innovation Directions in the Science, Technics, Education: Digest of Scientific Works on Materials of International Scientific and Practical Conference: in 2 parts]. Smolensk, LLC “Novalenso”, 2016, part 1, pp. 135-138. (In Russian). 10. Inyushkin N.M. Etnokul'turniy dialog v provintsial'nom khronotope [Ethnic and cultural dialog in provincial chronotope]. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Dialog kul'tur kak faktor bezopasnosti tsivilizatsionnogo protsessa» [Proceedings of All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Culture Dialog as a Factor of Civilization Process Safety”]. Pyatigorsk, Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University Publ., 2012, pp. 115-126. (In Russian).

Received

2018-03-22

Section of issue

Culturology

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.