Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Gender stereotypes of masculinity in dialect communication (based on the material of men's expletive nominations)

Annotation

The aim of the research is to describe some of the traditional gender stereotypes of masculinity that exist in modern dialectic communication, based on an analysis of the abusive names of men. The relevance of the topic is due to the significance of the problem for identifying, as well as for the justification and strengthening of gender asymmetry existing in the modern Russian society. The methodological basis of the study – implemented in the works of A.V. Kirilina’s understanding of gender as a sociocultural construct, suggesting a description of the stereotypical gender ideas about signs, qualities, patterns of behavior that exist in the society due to belonging to a particular gender and reflected in various units of the language. The study analyzes the abusive nominations of men in Russian dialects and notes their use primarily for designating carriers of those qualities that do not correlate in the popular consciousness with the traditional “ideal” image of a man as a representative of the dominant sex, with a predetermined natural world order, the right to have dominant positions in the society. The following are negatively assessed: lack of physical strength and endurance, economic skills; parasitism; staying in idleness; spinelessness, weakness, complaisance in family life; excessive modesty (mukhryshka, gatila, chuzhespinnik, khabol’nik, prodyra, etc.). The rejection of qualities that do not meet the standards of life of the village society, established national moral values, by males is also confirmed – arrogance, boastfulness, unsociability, as well as impudence, sneakiness, cunning, roguishness, shamelessness (chvanishka, khval’bun, molchaga, ukhach, shnyra, khap, etc.). Male qualities that were negatively assessed with the help of swearing nominations only in their excessive manifestation or selectively, were revealed – a tendency to drink alcohol, aggressiveness, freedom of behavior (p’yanushka, buzuy, chuzhebabnik, etc.).The small number of abusive nominations related to men with semantics traditionally correlated in a dialectic environment with belonging exclusively or mainly to women and thereby perceived as reducing a man’s status is justified – grouchiness, greed, talkativeness, fastidiousness, importunity, fussiness, cowardice, scandalous, clumsy (khnych, zhadoba, balaban, chemezinnik, mula, tolkun, khlysten’, tyulyapay, tupyak, etc.). The author concludes that the dialectic swearing nominations of men, indirectly reflecting the specifics of the Russian national-cultural consciousness, support patriarchal gender stereotypes, representing evidence of the androcentricity of the dialectic picture of the world.

Keywords

stereotype; abusive nomination; dialect communication; semantics; mentality; value system; gender

Full-text in one file

Download

DOI

10.20310/2587-6953-2020-6-21-5-14

UDC

81’28

Pages

5-14

References

1. Vendina T.I. Dialektnoye slovo: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [A dialect word: yesterday, today, tomorrow]. Vestnik Kostromskogo universiteta – Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2017, vol. 23, pp. 44-49. (In Russian). 2. Demeshkina T.A., Tolstova M.A. Gendernaya dialektologiya i slovari kak eyë istochnik [Gender dialectolo-gy and dictionaries as its source]. Voprosy leksikografii – Questions of lexicography, 2017, no. 12, pp. 83-105. (In Russian). 3. Novosyolova O.A. Nevestka i svekrov’ v dialektnoy kartine mira [Daughter-in-law and mother-in-law in the dialect picture of the world]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: istoriya, filologiya – Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: History and philology, 2012, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 197-201. (In Russian). 4. Tolstova M.A. Otrazheniye gendernoy kartiny mira v naimenovaniyakh lits zhenskogo pola v dialekte [Re-flection of the gender picture of the world in the names of females in the dialect]. Nauchnoye naslediye V.A. Bogoroditskogo i sovremennyy vektor issledovaniy Kazanskoy lingvisticheskoy shkoly: trudy i materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii [V.A. Bogoroditskiy's Scientific Heritage and the Modern Research Vector of the Kazan Linguistic School: Proceedings and Materials of the International Conference]. Kazan, 2016, pp. 292-298. (In Russian). 5. Tolstova M.A. Gender v traditsionnoy kul’ture skvoz’ prizmu slovarya [Gender in traditional culture through the prism of dictionary]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye – Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History, 2016, no. 4 (24), pp. 68-75. (In Russian). 6. Markina L.V. Gendernyye stereotipy v dialektnoy kommunikatsii (na materiale brannykh nominatsiy zhenshchin) [Gender stereotypes in dialect communication (based on the material of women's verbal nomi-nations)]. Rusistika i komparativistika [Russian Studies and Comparative Studies]. Moscow, Knigodel Publ., 2019, no. 13, pp. 234-243. (In Russian). 7. Demeshkina T.A., Tubalova I.V. Dialektnyy diskurs kak sfera realizatsii natsional’noy kul’tury: konstanty i transformatsii [Dialect discourse as a sphere of realization of national culture: constants and transfor-mations]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2017, no. 50, pp. 36-54. (In Russian). 8. Denisova A.A. (ed.) Slovar’ gendernykh terminov [Dictionary of Gender Terms]. Moscow, Informatsiya XXI vek, 2002, 256 p. (In Russian). 9. Markina L.V. Dialektnyye brannyye oboznacheniya zhenshchin (na materiale sovremennykh russkikh govorov) [Russian dialect designations of women (based on the material of modern Russian dialects)]. Russkiy yazyk i literatura v obrazovatel’nom protsesse: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Russian Language and Literature in the Educational Process: Collection of Ma-terials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Saratov, MarK Publishing House, 2016, pp. 64-69. (In Russian). 10. Sternin I.A. et al. Vyyavleniye priznakov unizheniya chesti, dostoinstva, umaleniya delovoy reputatsii i oskorbleniya v lingvisticheskoy ekspertize teksta. [Identification of Signs of Humiliation of Honor, Dignity, Diminution of Business Reputation and Insult in the Linguistic Examination of the Text]. Yaroslavl, 2013, 35 p. (In Russian).

Received

2019-11-18

Section of issue

Russian language

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.