Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Development of evaluative knowledge about educational activities in modern English

Annotation

The aim of the study is to develop evaluative knowledge about educational activities in modern English. The relevance of the study is determined by the cognitive approach, in the framework of which the level belonging of evaluative concepts is considered and the means of their representation are revealed. As the main method, the conceptual-definitional analysis is declared, on the basis of which the characteristics of the UPBRINGING concept are revealed and the evaluative benchmarks of the subject of assessment are established in relation to various aspects of educational activity, presented in the form of a frame. We determine that at the superordinate level, evaluative knowledge is based on the acceptability of certain indicators and their compliance with social norms. At this level, assessment is represented by the adjectives accepta-ble/unacceptable and proper. Evaluative knowledge of the basic level is represented by the adjec-tives good, bad, perfect, great, fine. For the observer, in this case, private evaluative meanings are not important, the assessment is presented in a gestalt manner and indicates the approval of the observer due to the compliance of a certain objective characteristic with the standard. At the subordinate level, the assessment is projected onto various private assessment benchmarks that are significant for the observer. It is concluded that the evaluative knowledge about educational activities is formed at the intersection of objective and evaluative characteristics.

Keywords

concept, frame, educational activity, assessment, levels of evaluative conceptualization

Full-text in one file

Download

DOI

10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-28-626-635

UDC

811

Pages

626-635

References

1. Arutyunova N.D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy: Otsenka, sobytiye, fakt [Types of Language Values: Assess-ment, Event, Fact]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988, 339 p. (In Russian). 2. Volf E.M. Funktsional’naya semantika otsenki [Functional Semantics of Evaluation]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2002, 280 p. (In Russian). 3. Teliya V.N. Konnotativnyy aspekt semantiki nominativnykh edinits [The Connotative Aspect of the Semantics of Nominative Units]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986, 143 p. (In Russian). 4. Boldyrev N.N. Kognitivnaya semantika. Vvedeniye v kognitivnuyu lingvistiku: kurs lektsiy [Cognitive Semantics. Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics: a Course of Lectures]. Tambov, Publishing House of Derzhavin Tambov State University, 2014, 236 p. (In Russian). 5. Furs L.A. Reguliruyushchaya funktsiya otsenochnykh kategoriy [Regulating function of evaluative categories]. Kognitivnyye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive Studies of Language]. Tambov, Publishing House of Derzhavin Tambov State University, 2016, pp. 657-665. (In Russian). 6. Arutyunova N.D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Human Language and World]. Moscow, Languages of the Russian Culture Publ., 1999, 896 p. (In Russian). 7. Fillmor C. Freymy i semantika ponimaniya [Frames and semantics of understanding]. Novoye v zarubezh-noy lingvistike [New in Foreign Linguistics]. Moscow, 1988, issue 23, pp. 52-92. (In Russian). 8. Fillmore C.J. Frame semantics. Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from the SICOL-1981. Seoul, Hanship Publ., 1982, pp. 111-137. 9. Croft W., Cruse A.D. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 355 p.

Received

2021-08-18

Section of issue

Language studies

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.