Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Criminal responsibility in domestic law in the context of the effectiveness of implementation: problems of theory and practice of application

Annotation

Optimization of responsibility of direction for crimes at the present stage of fighting crime is analyzed. The subject of research is the complex theoretical and practical problems of criminal responsibility, its concept, the base, the system forms, types, their implementation and effectiveness of criminal law theory, legal and law enforcement. The aim is a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the domestic industry legislation, its ability to implement the criminal liability regarding its concept base, content, forms, types and their effectiveness, the study of problems in law enforcement, identification of conflicts with the principles of criminal law and criminal policy law, on that basis to the state policy in the criminal justice field, making suggestions for its optimization. Achieving this goal is ensured by the decision of the next series of research tasks: review the history and formation of the criminal law category of “criminal responsibility” in the domestic general theory of law and sector-specific legislation, comparing use of domestic legislator criminal legal concept of “criminal responsibility” in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with the norms of modern criminal law of foreign countries, investigation of criminal legal relations and legal implications in the mechanism of legal regulation, the definition and clarification of the essence of criminal liability, the definition of performance criteria forms and types of criminal responsibility, the development of conceptual ways to improve public policy, sectoral legislation, ensuring effective implementation of criminal responsibility.

Keywords

types of penalties; efficiency; other measures under criminal law; criminal responsibility; Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

343.8

Pages

205-212

References

1. Zrazhevskaya T.D. Otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu gosudarstvennomu pravu. Voronezh, 1980. 2. Bobrova N.A. Otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ukrepleniya zakonnosti v gosudarstvenno-pravovykh otnosheniyakh // Yuridicheskie garantii primeneniya prava i rezhim sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti v SSSR. Yaroslavl', 1977. 3. Eleonskiy V.A. Ugolovnoe nakazanie i vospitanie pozitivnoy otvetstvennosti lichnosti. Ryazan', 1979. 4. Tarkhov V.A. Otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu. Saratov, 1973. 5. Orekhovskiy A.I. Otvetstvennost' i ee sotsial'naya priroda. Tomsk, 1978. 6. Smirnov V.G. Funktsii sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. L., 1965. 7. Kudryavtsev V.N. Pravovoe povedenie: norma i patologiya. M., 1982. 8. Bratus' S.N. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i zakonnost'. M., 1976. 9. Matuzov N.I. Pravovaya sistema i lichnost'. Saratov, 1987. 10. Rad'ko T.N. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' kak obshchaya forma realizatsii sotsial'nykh funktsiy v prave // Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' v sovetskom obshchestve. Volgograd, 1974. S. 11-23. 11. Razgel'deev N. T. Otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu prirodookhranitel'nomu pravu. Saratov, 1986. 12. Mal'ko A.V. Zakonnyy interes kak pravovaya kategoriya // Voprosy teorii gosudarstva i prava: mezhvuzovskiy nauchnyy sbornik. Saratov, 1986. Vyp. 7. S. 121-131. 13. Chernykh E.V. O dvukh aspektakh pravovoy otvetstvennosti v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve // Voprosy teorii gosudarstva i prava: mezhvuzovskiy nauchnyy sbornik. Saratov, 1976. Vyp. 4. S. 191-204. 14. Leyst O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu pravu. M., 1981. 15. Sitkovskaya O.D. Psikhologicheskie osnovy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yur. nauk. M., 1996. 16. Kuznetsova N.F. Tseli i mekhanizm reformy UK RF // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1992. № 2. 17. Astemirov Z.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' // Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. SPb., 2007. T. 8. S. 55-56. 18. Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz. M., 2009. 19. Milyukov S.F. Rossiyskaya sistema nakazaniy. SPb., 1998. 20. Razumov S. Prestupleniya i nakazaniya. K voprosu o sorazmernosti ustanovlennykh UK RF mer otvetstvennosti // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 11. S. 7-9. 21. Petrukhin I. Novyy Ugolovnyy kodeks: problema nakazaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 1999. № 3. S. 42-45. 22. Dzigar' A.L. Ugolovnye nakazaniya: evolyutsiya i perspektivy: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2001. 23. Osadchaya N.G. Obyazatel'nye raboty kak novyy vid nakazaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Rostov n/D, 1999. 24. Chernov A.D Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya vidov nakazaniya, ne svyazannykh s lisheniem svobody na sovremennom etape // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 1999. № 3. S. 17-19. 25. Taralenko K.N. O soderzhanii nakazaniya v vide obyazatel'nykh rabot // Razvitie al'ternativnykh sanktsiy v rossiyskoy ugolovnoy yustitsii: opyt i perspektivy: sbornik materialov mezhduna-rodnoy konferentsii. M., 2002. S. 67-71.

Received

2013-12-17

Section of issue

Law

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.