Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

CLINICAL CASE OF ADDITIONAL CORRECTION OF REFRACTIVE ERROR AFTER IMPLANTIONAL OF “PREMIUM CLASS” INTRAOCULAR LENS

Annotation

Hereby a clinical case of additional correction of refractive error with a LASIK after 5 months of implantation of the multifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) and Nd:YAG-laser posterior capsulotomy. Diagnostic was performed before and after LASIK. Before LASIK procedure the visual acuity for distance vision was 0.3 cyl -1.75D ax 95° = 0.9 and for near vision 0.2 sph + 2.5D cyl +1.5D ax 175° = 0.8. After 3 months of LASIK the visual acuity for distance vision was 1.0 and for near vision 0.7 sph + 0.5D = 1.0. The rest correction for near vision sph + 0.5D may be a result of long reabilitative period after IOL implantation.

Keywords

multifocal intraocular lens; toric intraocular lens; astigmatism; presbyopia; LASIK

Full-text in one file

Download

DOI

10.20310/1810-0198-2016-21-4-1505-1510

UDC

617.753.351

Pages

1505-1510

References

1. Anisimova S.Yu., Anisimov S.I., Zagrebel'naya L.V., Belikova E.I. Funktsional'nye rezul'taty implantatsii mul'tifokal'nykh intraokulyarnykh linz i metody korrektsii poluchennoy ametropii. Sovremennye tekhnologii kataraktal'noy i refraktsionnoy khirurgii – 2011. Moscow, 2011, pp. 17-22. 2. Shanturova M.A., Senchenko N.Ya. Fakoemul'sifikatsiya katarakty s implantatsiey toricheskikh IOL – effektivnyy sposob intraokulyarnoy korrektsii astigmatizma. Sovremennye tekhnologii kataraktal'noy i refraktsionnoy khirurgii – 2011. Moscow, 2011, pp. 265-269. 3. Carson D., Hill W.E., Hong X., Karakelle M. Optical bench performance of AcrySof(®) IQ ReSTOR(®), AT LISA(®) tri, and FineVision(®) intraocular lenses. Clin. Ophthalmol., 2014, vol. 8, pp. 2105-2113. 4. Hayashi K., Masumoto M., Takimoto M. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes after bilateral implantation of toric intraocular lenses with or without a multifocal component. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 2015, vol. 1, pp. 73-83. 5. Ioshin I.E. Intraokulyarnaya korrektsiya afakii. Moscow, April Publ., 2014. 118 p. 6. Aristodemou P., Cartwright N.E.K., Sparrow J.M., Johnston R.L. Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 2011, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 63-71. 7. Fernández-Buenaga R., Alió J.L., Pérez Ardoy A.L. et al. Resolving refractive error after cataract surgery: IOL exchange, piggyback lens, or LASIK. J. Refract. Surg., 2013, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 676-683. 8. Roberts C. The cornea is not a piece of plastic. J. Refract. Surg., 2000, vol. 16, pp. 407-413. 9. Kostenev S.V., Litasova Yu.A., Chernykh V.V. Issledovanie izmeneniy formy i tolshchiny rogovitsy posle laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Oftal'mokhirurgiya – The Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery, 2010, no. 2, pp. 4-7. 10. Tran D.B., Sarayba M.A., Bor Z. et al. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 2005, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 97-105. 11. Waheed S., Chalita M.R., Xu M., Krueger R.R. Flap-induced and laser-induced ocular aberrations in a two-step LASIK procedure. J. Refract. Surg., 2005, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 346-352. 12. Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Miyovich O.P. LASIK posle implantatsii IOL i skvoznykh peresadok rogovitsy. Oftal'mokhirurgiya – The Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery, 2001, no. 3, pp. 16-23.

Received

2016-03-20

Section of issue

Scholarly articles

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.