Menu: Home :: go to Journal :: switch to Russian :: switch to English
You are here: all Journals and Issues→ Journal→ Issue→ Article

Subjects of public relations: problems of understanding and classification

Annotation

Relevance of the mentioned perspective is caused by that today there is no uniform conventional classification of subjects of public legal relationship. An attempt to define the criteria for the classification of subjects of public law, reflecting the specificity of this type of relationship, is made. The author's definition of “subject of public law”, as well as identifying differences in the content between its related concepts “subject of public legal relationship” and “participant of the public legal relationship” is presented. Also attention is drawn to the problem of inconsistency in the use of the common terminology used in relation to entities involved in public relations. The principal features of public legal entities, allowing distinguishing them from subjects of private law relations are designated. Also relevant in the modern realities of the problem of the public status of such categories of subjects of public relations as a people is considered. In the course of research the historicism method, and also analysis and synthesis methods was used.

Keywords

classification; subject of law; subject of public legal relationship; participant of public legal relationship; obligatory subject; official

Full-text in one file

Download

UDC

34.023

Pages

177-182

References

1. Trubetskoy E.N. Entsiklopediya prava. SPb., 1999. 2. Volos A.A. Zhivotnye – sub"ekt prava? URL: http://zakon.ru/discussions/zhivotnye__subekt_prava/1982 (data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2014). 3. Alekseev S.S., Arkhipov S.I. [i dr.]. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 2005. 4. Argunova Yu.N. Prava grazhdan s psikhicheskimi rasstroystvami. M., 2007. 5. Kechek'yan S.F. Pravootnosheniya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve. M., 1958. 6. Mironov O.E. Sub"ekty sovetskogo gosudarstvennogo prava: avtoref. dis. … kand. yur. nauk. Saratov, 1969. 7. Zatulina T.N. Konstitutsionno-pravovoy status uchastnikov nalogovykh pravootnosheniy // Sovremennoe pravo. 2007. № 4. S. 57-59. 8. Gerashchenko I.N. Publichnyy sub"ekt: nekotorye problemy opredeleniya ponyatiya // Voprosy ekonomiki i prava. 2011. № 3. S. 175-180. 9. Lavrenyuk A.V. Sub"ekty publichnogo prava: teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. … kand. yur. nauk. M., 2007. 10. Taranovskiy F.V. Entsiklopediya prava. SPb., 2001. 11. Luparev E.B., Dobrobaba M.B., Mokina T.V. Obshchaya teoriya publichnykh pravootnosheniy: monografiya. M., 2011. 12. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Teoriya kompetentsii. M., 2001. 13. Po delu o tolkovanii polozheniy statey 91 i 92 (chast' 2) Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii o dosrochnom prekrashchenii polnomochiy Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sluchae stoykoy nesposobnosti po sostoyaniyu zdorov'ya osushchestvlyat' prinadlezhashchie emu polnomochiya: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo suda RF № 12-P ot 11 iyulya 2000 goda // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. № 140. 14. Pokrovskiy I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. M., 2001.

Received

2014-05-11

Section of issue

Civil society and state

Для корректной работы сайта используйте один из современных браузеров. Например, Firefox 55, Chrome 60 или более новые.