The policy was discussed and approved at the Editorial Board meeting
of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law”
on Feb. 25, 2025
AUTHORSHIP, AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Authorship
The journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” adheres to the following authorship criteria (developed and described in the ICMJE recommendations):
In addition to being accountable for the parts of the work done, an author should be able to identify which co-authors are responsible for specific other parts of the work. In addition, authors should have confidence in the integrity of the contributions of their co-authors. All those designated as authors should meet all four criteria for authorship, and all who meet the four criteria should be identified as authors. Those who do not meet all four criteria should be mentioned in the “Acknowledgments” section.
Contribution of authors and non-authors
The “Acknowledgments” section may mention people who contributed to the work but do not meet the criteria for authorship, for example: who supported the study, acted as a mentor, assisted with data collection, coordinated the study, etc.
In order to correctly determine the contribution, the authors of “Current Issues of the State and Law” journal can use CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy.
Accountability
It is the editors of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” who are accountable for adhering to the standards of authorship and author’s contribution.
The authors are obliged to provide transparent and correct information about the authors of the article and persons who made a significant contribution to the preparation of the article.
If a manuscript is submitted to the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” by the Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editor-in-Chief, member of the Editorial Board or Editorial Council, the manuscript is reviewed only by external experts.
Authorship statement
By submitting an article signed by all declared authors to the Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law”, they guarantee that:
Upon receipt of the article, the editor checks the availability of information about the authors and all necessary documents. In the absence of signatures of all authors, the article is not accepted for consideration.
Disputes
In case of authorship disputes, the work with the article is terminated regardless of the stage (consideration, peer review, editing or preparation for printing) it is at.
All co-authors are informed about the authorship dispute by e-mail.
The editor of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” has the right to specify the exact period within which the authors can provide clarification on the requested issues. After the expiration of this deadline, the article is withdrawn from publication with the corresponding explanation.
If a dispute arises with respect to a published article, the editor of “Current Issues of the State and Law” publishes a correction, refutation, or withdrawal of the article, indicating the reason for the changes in the published document.
If it is necessary to add or remove a co-author before or after publication, the Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” adheres to COPE guidelines: Changes in authorship. Adoption of extra author – before publication, Changes in authorship: Removal of author – before publication.
To prevent manipulation of co-authorship, the Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” uses COPE Flowchart and pays attention to the following when working with the article:
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” expects that organizations affiliated with the author will be willing to participate in the investigation of authorship disputes.
COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” is attentive to complaints about the behavior of editors and reviewers, which may concern such issues as breach of confidentiality, undisclosed conflicts of interest, misuse of confidential information obtained during the peer review process. Authors may also disagree with decisions regarding the expression of doubts on certain articles or complain about violations of editorial processes.
All complaints can be emailed to ilina@tsutmb.ru, and will be dealt with in a general manner. The grievance procedure does not take more than 7 days. The person who sent the complaint will be informed about the decision taken, as well as the measures to be taken and the timeframe for their implementation.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
Conflict of interests (according to WAME recommendations) is a condition in which people have conflicting or competing interests that can influence editorial decision making as well as the interpretation of data in an article. Conflicts of interests can be potential or recognized as well as actual. Personal, political, financial, scientific, or religious factors may affect objectivity.
Conflicts of interests may cover the following areas:
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” may ask the authors additional questions or request additional information if necessary.
Conflict of interests may concern authors, reviewers and editors.
The following policy terms are based on ICMJE recommendations.
Responsibilities of authors in disclosing conflict of interests
When authors submit a manuscript they are responsible for disclosing all relationships and activities that might bias or be seen to bias their work.
The author must disclose any actual or potential conflict of interests to the editor by including information about the conflict of interests in the respective section of the article.
If there is no conflict of interests, the author must also disclose it. Example of wording: “The author declares no relevant conflict of interests”.
Responsibilities of reviewers in disclosing conflict of interests
Reviewers must disclose to editors any conflict of interests that could bias their opinions of the manuscript, and should recuse themselves from reviewing specific manuscripts if the potential for bias exists. Reviewers must not use knowledge of the work they’re reviewing before its publication to further their own interests.
Responsibilities of editors when disclosing a conflict of interests
Editors who make final decisions about manuscripts should recuse themselves from editorial decisions if they have relationships or conflict of interests that pose potential conflicts related to articles under consideration. Other editorial staff members who participate in editorial decisions must provide editors with a current description of their relationships and activities (as they might relate to editorial judgments) and recuse themselves from any decisions in which an interest that poses a potential conflict exists. Editorial staff must not use information gained through working with manuscripts for private gain. Editors should regularly publish their own disclosure statements and those of their journal staff.
Articles by the Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editor-in-Chief, and members of the Editorial Board should clearly state the affiliation with the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law”.
If an undisclosed conflict of interests is found in an unpublished article, the Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” will act according to COPE guidelines.
If an undisclosed conflict of interests is found in a published article, the Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” will act according to COPE guidelines.
DATA REUSE AND REPLICABILITY
This section of the policy has been developed based on COPE recommendations for handling data.
Authors are encouraged to provide access to the research data that substantiate the content of their publications but it is not mandatory. Authors’ consent to provide access to research data does not influence the decision to publish.
Definition of research data
Research data includes any factual material recorded in any medium used in the process of obtaining research results, whether in digital or non-digital form. This includes tabular data, code, images, audio and video files, documents, maps, processed and/or raw data. This policy applies to research data that may be required to validate research findings in articles published by “Current Issues of the State and Law”. Research data includes information obtained directly by the authors (“primary data”) as well as data from other sources analyzed by the authors during the course of the study (“secondary data”).
Data archiving
The preferred way to share data is through the use of data repositories (https://repositoryfinder.datacite.org/).
Data citation
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” welcomes access to research data under Creative Commons licenses. The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” does not insist on the mandatory use of public licenses when data are hosted in third-party repositories. The publisher of “Current Issues of the State and Law” does not claim ownership of the research data provided by the author along with the article.
Letters of inquiry about compliance with this policy may be addressed to the Executive Secretary of “Current Issues of the State and Law”.
ETHICAL OVERSIGHT
“Current Issues of the State and Law” shares COPE’s view that publication ethics includes not only ensuring the integrity and reliability of published research, but also ethical behavior towards research subjects. This category includes vulnerable population groups, laboratory animals, human subjects (in the case of relevant research), confidential data and business/marketing practices.
Vulnerable population groups
Vulnerable population groups include (but are not limited to) those who are unable to protect their own interests: pregnant women, newborns, children, fetuses in the womb, prisoners, disabled, mentally disabled, economically disadvantaged, hospitalized patients in serious condition, etc.
Research in vulnerable population groups should be planned only if these groups will benefit from the research. One concern is that not all research participants, for objective reasons, may understand all the conditions of the research. If informed consent cannot be obtained from a direct research participant, this consent must be signed by their legal representative. Particular care should be taken in research involving children.
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” supports COPE’s statement on the publication of research involving vulnerable population groups.
Authors of articles should obtain informed consent for publication and notify the Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law”.
Handling sensitive data
The right to privacy of individuals or organizations involved in the research is of paramount importance and should not be violated without their informed consent. The authors must take all necessary precautions to protect information about research participants. If necessary, the authors must take measures to minimize any potential physical and psychological harm to research participants.
POST-PUBLICATION DISCUSSIONS AND CHANGES TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
In some cases, it may be necessary to make changes to an article that has already been published. The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” supports the practice of making changes to published materials and, in case of such necessity, acts in accordance with COPE recommendations.
Any necessary changes will be accompanied by a post-publication notification, which will always be linked to the original version of the article so that readers can be informed of any necessary changes. The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” uses Expression of Doubt, Correction or Retraction of an article. The purpose of this practice is to ensure the integrity of scholarly materials.
All Corrections, Expressions of Doubt and Retractions are publicly available.
What should authors do when they find an error in their article?
Authors may discover a technical or semantic error after the article has been published. In such a case, authors should notify the Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” as soon as possible, especially in case of errors that may affect the interpretation of the results or cast doubt on the reliability of the information. The author responsible for correspondence is responsible for reaching an agreement in the author's team on further interaction with the Editorial Board.
If you believe a published article needs to be modified, please contact us via email ilina@tsutmb.ru
Algorithm for making modifications to an article
Correction
Corrections are made to an article when it is necessary to correct an error or add missing information that does not affect the integrity and scientific significance of the article.
Corrections can be made, for example, in the figure caption, information on research funding can be added, or information on conflict of interests can be clarified.
If such changes are made, a separate announcement of the correction is published. The general algorithm of actions is as follows:
Messages about corrections of spelling errors, typos, and other minor changes are not published separately. The site informs that corrections were made to the article (without detailing).
Retraction
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” decides to retract an article in the following cases:
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” acts according to the following algorithm when an article needs to be retracted:
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” deals with retracted articles according to COPE regulations.
Expression of doubt
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” reports expressions of doubt in the following cases:
Once the investigation has been completed, the article may be amended or retracted.
Removal of an article
Articles from the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” will be removed only in extreme cases when it is not possible to follow the protocol of correcting, retracting the article or expressing doubts.
An article may be removed in the following cases:
If an article is removed, all materials are removed from the journal’s website, requests are sent to databases to remove the full text and post a message about the article’s removal.
UPDATES AND POST-PUBLICATION DISCUSSIONS OF ARTICLES
Supplements to the published article
The author may need to supplement the article some time after its publication. In this case, the Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” can publish a supplement to the article. Supplements to articles are necessarily checked by the editors of the journal and may be sent for peer review.
When the supplement is published, the file with the original version of the article is updated, and the current issue of the journal additionally includes a notice about the supplement to the article, including information about the article, its authors, the essence of the changes made and a link to the article.
Commentary to a published article
Commentaries are short pieces that may express an opinion or observation about a published article. Commentaries are sent to the reviewers and authors of the article so that they have an opportunity to prepare a response to the commentary.
The authors’ comment is also sent to the reviewer. The author of the comment will have an opportunity to reply to the authors again, after which correspondence between the author of the comment and the authors of the article may continue privately.
The decision to publish comments is made by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law”. Comments are linked to the original version of the article to which they refer.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE JOURNAL: EDITORIAL BOARD, EDITORS, PUBLISHER, FOUNDER
Principles for forming an Editorial Board
The Editorial Board of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” is guided by COPE principles when forming the Editorial Board.
Potential members of the Editorial Board can be recommended to the Editor-in-Chief by current members of the Editorial Board, reviewers and authors.
Editors who wish to participate in the work with the journal as a member of the editorial board can send an application to the Editor-in-Chief.
All potential Editorial Board members must agree to the following conditions:
Responsibilities of the Editorial Board member:
Editorial Board member may be excluded for the following reasons:
Privileges of an Editorial Board Member
The possibility of participation of potential candidates for the role of a member of the Editorial Board is considered at regular meetings of the Editorial Board.
The final decision on the inclusion of a potential candidate in the editorial board is made by the Editor-in-Chief and is fixed by the University’s decree.
Editor’s responsibility
The final decision on publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief of “Current Issues of the State and Law”.
The editor of “Current Issues of the State and Law” is guided by the journal’s policies when reviewing an article and deciding whether to publish it. The editor may discuss the article and the reviewer’s comments with other editors and reviewers, provided that these discussions are justified and legitimate, without using the material discussed for personal gain.
The editor of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” is obliged to evaluate the content of the manuscript regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious views, origin, citizenship or political preferences of the authors.
The editor of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” must ensure confidentiality and not disclose information about the manuscript to third parties (except for other editors of the journal, reviewers, publisher and founder).
The editor of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” is obliged to inform the Editor-in-Chief about all conflict situations, as well as about the detection of critical errors or accusations of authors or reviewers in violation of publication ethics, received by the journal, in order to take the necessary actions in such cases: making changes, publishing rebuttals, retracting the article, expressing doubts.
The editor of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” takes part in the investigation of any ethical violations concerning manuscripts under review and published articles, and makes every effort to resolve conflicts as soon as possible. If necessary, the editor of “Current Issues of the State and Law” will work with the author’s organization to conduct a more in-depth investigation.
Publisher’s responsibility
The publisher of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” is responsible for compliance with all current guidelines and requirements to maintain the integrity of scientific materials published in the journal.
The publisher of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” does not interfere with the editorial processes. However, if necessary and at the request of the editors the publisher can take part in the investigation of violations of publication ethics, as well as send official requests on their behalf to scientific and educational organizations, and other publishers.
The publisher of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” is obliged to implement industry standards in the work of the publishing house in order to improve the ethical component of the journal.
The publisher of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” is obliged to provide comprehensive legal support to the Editorial Board of the journal if necessary.
Founder’s responsibility
The founder of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” adheres to the principle of editorial independence: the university rector and staff do not interfere with the editorial process.
The founder of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” can recommend potential members of the Editorial Board, reviewers and authors, but the final decision on the possibility of cooperation with them is made only by the Editor-in-Chief.
The founder of Current Issues of the State and Law supports the need to ensure geographic and gender diversity among Editorial Board members, reviewers and authors.
The founder of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” does not put financial and political gain above the quality of the journal. The editors of “Current Issues of the State and Law” decide on the publication of manuscripts based on their quality and interest to the target audience of the journal.
The founder of the journal “Current Issues of the State and Law” does not interfere in the editorial processes. However, if necessary and at the request of the editors the founder can take part in the investigation of violations of publication ethics, as well as send official requests on its behalf to scientific and educational organizations and other publishers.
Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License
(http://creativecommons.org/l/censes/by/4.0/)